Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Annotate Windows Server 2012 as deprecated #545

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 16, 2023

Conversation

jean-edouard
Copy link
Contributor

@jean-edouard jean-edouard commented Aug 15, 2023

What this PR does / why we need it:
This PR adds an annotation to the Windows Server 2012 R2 template to tag it as deprecated.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):
Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Release note:

Windows Server 2012 R2 is now deprecated

@kubevirt-bot kubevirt-bot added release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. dco-signoff: yes Indicates the PR's author has DCO signed all their commits. labels Aug 15, 2023
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
set -ex

namespace="kubevirt"
template_name="windows2k12r2"
template_name=""
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This will break the script if no TARGET env was provided.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Right, thanks for the review, do you have a preferred default?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's go with windows2k22 as the current successor.

Please note that this also needs adjustment of the CI jobs in openshift/release. At least the 2k12 lane needs to be removed.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Default fixed, and created openshift/release#42370

@lyarwood
Copy link
Member

lyarwood commented Aug 15, 2023

I'm against this, looking at the docs:

https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/lifecycle/announcements/windows-server-2012-r2-end-of-support

Windows Server 2012 and Windows Server 2012 R2 will end on October 10, 2023. After this date, these products will no longer receive security updates, non-security updates, bug fixes, technical support, or online technical content updates. If you cannot upgrade to the next version, you will need to use Extended Security Updates (ESUs) for up to three years. ESUs are available for free in Azure or need to be purchased for on-premises deployments. Microsoft has guidance for both cloud and on-premises solutions. Go here to learn more.

So it's still available through EUS, would it be better to mark the templates as deprecated and drop CI coverage for now?

That's going to be my approach in common-instancetypes anyway:

kubevirt/common-instancetypes#99

@jean-edouard jean-edouard changed the title Remove Windows 2k12 template, as Windows 2012R2 is reaching EOL Annotate Windows Server 2012 as deprecated Aug 15, 2023
Signed-off-by: Jed Lejosne <jed@redhat.com>
@jean-edouard
Copy link
Contributor Author

I'm against this, looking at the docs:

https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/lifecycle/announcements/windows-server-2012-r2-end-of-support

Windows Server 2012 and Windows Server 2012 R2 will end on October 10, 2023. After this date, these products will no longer receive security updates, non-security updates, bug fixes, technical support, or online technical content updates. If you cannot upgrade to the next version, you will need to use Extended Security Updates (ESUs) for up to three years. ESUs are available for free in Azure or need to be purchased for on-premises deployments. Microsoft has guidance for both cloud and on-premises solutions. Go here to learn more.

So it's still available through EUS, would it be better to mark the templates as deprecated and drop CI coverage for now?

That's going to be my approach in common-instancetypes anyway:

kubevirt/common-instancetypes#99

Done, PTAL!

@lyarwood
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

Thanks! If you respin please include the link to the support docs in the commit and description of the PR for context.

@kubevirt-bot kubevirt-bot added lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. and removed lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. labels Aug 15, 2023
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 15, 2023

@jean-edouard: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-common-templates-centos6 02b0476 link true /test e2e-gcp-common-templates-centos6
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-common-templates-ubuntu 02b0476 link true /test e2e-gcp-common-templates-ubuntu
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-common-templates-centos-stream9 02b0476 link true /test e2e-gcp-common-templates-centos-stream9
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-common-templates-rhel9 02b0476 link true /test e2e-gcp-common-templates-rhel9
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-common-templates-centos-stream8 02b0476 link true /test e2e-gcp-common-templates-centos-stream8
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-common-templates-rhel7 02b0476 link true /test e2e-gcp-common-templates-rhel7
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-common-templates-rhel8 02b0476 link true /test e2e-gcp-common-templates-rhel8
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-common-templates-centos7 02b0476 link true /test e2e-gcp-common-templates-centos7
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-common-templates-windows10 02b0476 link true /test e2e-gcp-common-templates-windows10
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-common-templates-windows11 02b0476 link true /test e2e-gcp-common-templates-windows11
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-common-templates-windows2022 02b0476 link true /test e2e-gcp-common-templates-windows2022
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-common-templates-windows2019 02b0476 link true /test e2e-gcp-common-templates-windows2019
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-common-templates-windows2012 02b0476 link true /test e2e-gcp-common-templates-windows2012
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-common-templates-windows2016 02b0476 link true /test e2e-gcp-common-templates-windows2016
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-common-templates-fedora 02b0476 link true /test e2e-gcp-common-templates-fedora

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@lyarwood
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

@kubevirt-bot kubevirt-bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 16, 2023
Copy link
Member

@0xFelix 0xFelix left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/approve

Thanks!

@kubevirt-bot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: 0xFelix

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@kubevirt-bot kubevirt-bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Aug 16, 2023
@kubevirt-bot kubevirt-bot merged commit a18b662 into kubevirt:master Aug 16, 2023
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. dco-signoff: yes Indicates the PR's author has DCO signed all their commits. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. size/XS
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants