labels,sig/compute: migrate sig/virtualization #3764
Conversation
The label `sig/virtualization`i [1] seems to be a leftover from previous times - we should migrate it into the sig/compute label. [1]: https://github.com/kubevirt/kubevirt/labels?q=sig%2Fvirtualization Signed-off-by: Daniel Hiller <dhiller@redhat.com>
kubevirt-bot
added
the
dco-signoff: yes
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
Thank you @dhiller! Looks great! WDYT about addressing the other sig labels as well as discussed here #2764 (comment)? |
@iholder101 I was thinking about asking the community before doing this - however, this shouldn't block this PR. WDYT? |
|
/override pull-project-infra-prow-deploy-test since it's not relevant |
|
@dhiller: Overrode contexts on behalf of dhiller: pull-project-infra-prow-deploy-test In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
Yeah I agree it shouldn't block it. Thanks @dhiller! |
What this PR does / why we need it:
The label
sig/virtualizationi 1 seems to be a leftover from previous times - we should migrate it into the sig/compute label.Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in
fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):Fixes #
Special notes for your reviewer:
/cc @iholder101 @vladikr @brianmcarey