Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 28, 2020. It is now read-only.

add attach PVC without clone functionality + refactor naming #283

Closed
atiratree opened this issue Mar 21, 2019 · 13 comments
Closed

add attach PVC without clone functionality + refactor naming #283

atiratree opened this issue Mar 21, 2019 · 13 comments
Labels
lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed.

Comments

@atiratree
Copy link
Contributor

moving the conversation from #241 to here.

The current state:
Attach Disk -> clones and attaches PVC
Provision source IMAGE -> clones and boots from PVC

The new flow of storage tab should take this into account and add a possibility to attach PVC without cloning and to unify the naming across the whole UI.

@atiratree
Copy link
Contributor Author

@aglitke @matthewcarleton

@matthewcarleton
Copy link
Contributor

Do we need both the concept of attach and clone or can we just stick with clone? If so I think what we have proposed for the storage step makes sense (add versus create and attach). Is there a benefit to attaching without cloning?

@atiratree
Copy link
Contributor Author

Do we need both the concept of attach and clone or can we just stick with clone?

cc @jelkosz

If so I think what we have proposed for the storage step makes sense (add versus create and attach).

I agree; to click add and then choose the specifics. There could be also an option/checkbox for cloning.

Is there a benefit to attaching without cloning?

There is. Users can create/import their own PVCs and wish to use it only in their one VM. Forcing cloning leads to wasting storage space.

@matthewcarleton
Copy link
Contributor

There is. Users can create/import their own PVCs and wish to use it only in their one VM. Forcing cloning leads to wasting storage space.

so it seems like we will want to offer both clone and attach. We could go with @aglitke suggestion of clone disk and attach disk. In storage when selecting we can add an clone this disk checkbox. Does that make sense?

@atiratree
Copy link
Contributor Author

it does if I understand it correctly. So we would add CLONE_DISK as a provisioning source now and then fix/implement the storage tab in the future.

@matthewcarleton
Copy link
Contributor

yes, I believe so. I'd like @aglitke thoughts on this too, but that makes sense to me.

@atiratree
Copy link
Contributor Author

changed to Cloned Disk in #291

@kubevirt-bot
Copy link

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle stale

@kubevirt-bot kubevirt-bot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jun 24, 2019
@kubevirt-bot
Copy link

Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Rotten issues close after an additional 30d of inactivity.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle rotten

@kubevirt-bot kubevirt-bot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Jul 24, 2019
@kubevirt-bot
Copy link

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.
Reopen the issue with /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.

/close

2 similar comments
@kubevirt-bot
Copy link

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.
Reopen the issue with /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.

/close

@kubevirt-bot
Copy link

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.
Reopen the issue with /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.

/close

@kubevirt-bot
Copy link

@kubevirt-bot: Closing this issue.

In response to this:

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.
Reopen the issue with /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.

/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants