-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30
add attach PVC without clone functionality + refactor naming #283
Comments
Do we need both the concept of attach and clone or can we just stick with clone? If so I think what we have proposed for the storage step makes sense ( |
cc @jelkosz
I agree; to click add and then choose the specifics. There could be also an option/checkbox for cloning.
There is. Users can create/import their own PVCs and wish to use it only in their one VM. Forcing cloning leads to wasting storage space. |
so it seems like we will want to offer both clone and attach. We could go with @aglitke suggestion of |
it does if I understand it correctly. So we would add |
yes, I believe so. I'd like @aglitke thoughts on this too, but that makes sense to me. |
changed to |
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity. If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /lifecycle stale |
Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity. If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /lifecycle rotten |
Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity. /close |
2 similar comments
Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity. /close |
Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity. /close |
@kubevirt-bot: Closing this issue. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
moving the conversation from #241 to here.
The current state:
Attach Disk -> clones and attaches PVC
Provision source IMAGE -> clones and boots from PVC
The new flow of storage tab should take this into account and add a possibility to attach PVC without cloning and to unify the naming across the whole UI.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: