Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: Decode and Encode derives (#1031) #2329

Closed

Conversation

benluelo
Copy link
Contributor

@benluelo benluelo commented Feb 1, 2023

Should fix #1031. I'm planning on adding some ui tests for the macros in the next few days 👍 I will open a follow-up PR with said UI tests as that is a much larger change.

Question - is there is any good way to test the whole workspace with the entire (valid) feature matrix?

@abonander abonander force-pushed the main branch 2 times, most recently from 6cf15b0 to eade49c Compare February 21, 2023 22:56
@abonander
Copy link
Collaborator

@benluelo can you fix the merge conflicts?

@abonander
Copy link
Collaborator

Closing due to inactivity. Feel free to reopen if you come back to this.

@abonander abonander closed this Mar 4, 2023
@benluelo
Copy link
Contributor Author

I'm unable to reopen this, but I've rebased off of the latest main so this should be good to go!

@guilhermewerner
Copy link

Any update on this?

@abonander
Copy link
Collaborator

@benluelo I'm so sorry, I didn't realize that if I closed a PR the author wouldn't be able to reopen it. It won't let me reopen it either now that you've pushed to the branch so feel free to open a new PR.

@benluelo
Copy link
Contributor Author

No worries - I've opened a new pr (#2940)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Implementation of sqlx::Decode is not general enough
3 participants