Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove Clone + Copy bounds from ElfNSlice type #929

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 18, 2024

Conversation

d-e-s-o
Copy link
Collaborator

@d-e-s-o d-e-s-o commented Dec 18, 2024

Similar to what we did for the ElfN enum, remove the Clone & Copy impls of the ElfNSlice type. Not requiring these impls makes the code more amenable to future changes.

Similar to what we did for the ElfN enum, remove the Clone & Copy impls
of the ElfNSlice type. Not requiring these impls makes the code more
amenable to future changes.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Müller <deso@posteo.net>
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 18, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 94.56%. Comparing base (3844896) to head (7685b56).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #929      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   94.47%   94.56%   +0.09%     
==========================================
  Files          57       57              
  Lines       10496    10496              
==========================================
+ Hits         9916     9926      +10     
+ Misses        580      570      -10     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@d-e-s-o d-e-s-o merged commit d16878d into libbpf:main Dec 18, 2024
41 checks passed
@d-e-s-o d-e-s-o deleted the topic/elfnslice-clone branch December 18, 2024 19:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant