-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 186
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
cleanup: fix vet and staticcheck failures #435
Conversation
That thing with the break is really innocuous, we can just remove it.
We can just replace it with a
That's just silly/stupid; just go ahead and change them. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
maybe add some short-circuit code for breaking the test when we have goroutines failing? Or wait for them. Not sure what's prudent.
Is this a reference to the replacement of t.Fatal with t.Error+return in test goroutines? In these cases the test still fails. |
yeah, just worried it might get blocked somewhere.
…On Mon, Jul 19, 2021, 15:55 Ian Davis ***@***.***> wrote:
breaking
Is this a reference to the replacement of t.Fatal with t.Error+return in
test goroutines? In these cases the test still fails.
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#435 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAAI4STAYF6ZDBKPD2PIAN3TYQOCXANCNFSM5ATQVWAA>
.
|
OK. In |
Done this in 4238ca7 |
Fixes the safe staticcheck failures. The following remain and need more thought or explicit ignores.
May indicate a bug, not clear what the intention is here:
Needs a decision on the alternative:
Changing these may break clients who rely on error string text: