Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Docs: Update Customizing section of Libp2p Config to reflect Service constraints #1763

Closed
maschad opened this issue May 18, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #1771
Closed

Docs: Update Customizing section of Libp2p Config to reflect Service constraints #1763

maschad opened this issue May 18, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #1771
Assignees
Labels
P1 High: Likely tackled by core team if no one steps up topic/docs Documentation

Comments

@maschad
Copy link
Member

maschad commented May 18, 2023

Description:

The customization section of the docs should reflect that we do facilitate the custom modules being passed in as services in the Libp2p config but also ensure that consumers understand that some services depend on others e.g. such as circuit relay v2 and kad-dht don't really work without identify

@maschad maschad added the need/triage Needs initial labeling and prioritization label May 18, 2023
@maschad maschad added topic/docs Documentation P1 High: Likely tackled by core team if no one steps up and removed need/triage Needs initial labeling and prioritization labels May 23, 2023
@maschad maschad self-assigned this May 23, 2023
maschad added a commit to maschad/js-libp2p that referenced this issue May 25, 2023
maschad added a commit to maschad/js-libp2p that referenced this issue May 25, 2023
achingbrain added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 5, 2023
Closes #1763

Co-authored-by: Alex Potsides <alex@achingbrain.net>

---------

Co-authored-by: Alex Potsides <alex@achingbrain.net>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
P1 High: Likely tackled by core team if no one steps up topic/docs Documentation
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant