Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

WIP: Fix Prysm compatibility #42

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

WIP: Fix Prysm compatibility #42

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

hendrikhofstadt
Copy link

No description provided.

@hendrikhofstadt hendrikhofstadt changed the title Fix Prysm compatibility WIP: Fix Prysm compatibility Nov 27, 2020
@ongrid
Copy link
Contributor

ongrid commented Nov 27, 2020

This is fixed in development branch daemon_v2 on 9e703b9 , now under integration within e2e environment. Prysm support will be introduced in v2.0.

@ongrid ongrid added the wontfix This will not be worked on label Nov 27, 2020
@hendrikhofstadt
Copy link
Author

This is fixed in development branch daemon_v2 on 9e703b9 , now under integration within e2e environment. Prysm support will be introduced in v2.0.

Looks like this fix is missing skipping unknown validators and still mismatches slots/epochs i.e. changes made here: f4c9eb7

Otherwise LGTM

@ongrid
Copy link
Contributor

ongrid commented Dec 8, 2020

fixed by PR #61

@ongrid ongrid closed this Dec 8, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
wontfix This will not be worked on
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants