Update networks.json #817
Update networks.json #817
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces several modifications across multiple configuration files. The Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
script/deploy/facets/DeployTokenWrapper.s.sol (1)
Line range hint
1-38: Overall assessment: Changes look good, pending verification.The modifications to use a centralized
networks.jsonfile and update the JSON structure for wrapped token addresses are logical and align with the PR objectives. These changes should improve the scalability and organization of network-specific configurations.However, to ensure a smooth transition:
- Verify that all references to the old
tokenwrapper.jsonfile have been updated throughout the codebase.- Confirm that the
networks.jsonfile exists and has the correct structure.- Test the deployment script with various network configurations to ensure it works as expected.
Consider documenting the new structure of the
networks.jsonfile in the project's documentation to help other developers understand and maintain it.script/deploy/safe/config.ts (1)
Line range hint
3-35: Consider adding a clarifying comment about URL patterns.The
safeApiUrlsobject contains a mix of URL patterns, with some using the.safe.globaldomain and others using custom domains. It might be helpful to add a comment explaining the reason for these differences or any plans for future standardization.Consider adding a comment like this at the beginning of the
safeApiUrlsobject:export const safeApiUrls: Record<string, string> = { // Note: URL patterns may vary due to network-specific requirements. // We are gradually migrating to the .safe.global domain where possible. mainnet: 'https://safe-transaction-mainnet.safe.global/api', // ... (rest of the object) }This comment would provide context for future maintainers and contributors.
config/global.json (1)
Line range hint
11-11: Remove duplicatepauserWalletentryThere are two entries for
pauserWalletwith different addresses:
"0x3b6211981d47Fb6375E0125A6a401830616f7906"(line 11)"0x29DaCdF7cCaDf4eE67c923b4C22255A4B2494eD7"(line 16)This duplication can lead to unexpected behavior and potential security risks. Please remove one of these entries, keeping only the correct and up-to-date
pauserWalletaddress.To resolve this, remove one of the
pauserWalletentries:"pauserWallet": "0x3b6211981d47Fb6375E0125A6a401830616f7906", "lifuelRebalanceWallet": "0xC71284231A726A18ac85c94D75f9fe17A185BeAF", "deployerWallet": "0x11F1022cA6AdEF6400e5677528a80d49a069C00c", - "pauserWallet": "0x29DaCdF7cCaDf4eE67c923b4C22255A4B2494eD7",Ensure that the remaining address is the correct and most up-to-date one for the pauser wallet.
Also applies to: 16-16
config/networks.json (2)
9-16: New fields added consistently across networksThe addition of
rpcUrl,explorerType,explorerUrl,explorerApiUrl,multicallAddress,safeApiUrl, andsafeAddressfields to each network entry improves the configuration's completeness. The 'type' field is consistently set to "mainnet" for all networks (except localanvil), which is appropriate.However, the
safeAddressfield is empty for all networks.Consider adding a TODO comment or documentation explaining why this field is currently empty and if/when it will be populated.
Also applies to: 25-32, 41-48, 57-64, 73-80, 89-96, 105-112, 121-128, 137-144, 153-160, 169-176, 185-192, 201-208, 217-224, 233-240, 249-256, 265-272, 281-288, 297-304, 313-320, 329-336, 345-352, 361-368, 377-384, 393-400, 409-416, 425-432, 441-448, 457-464, 473-480, 489-496, 505-512
Line range hint
498-512: 'localanvil' test network entryThe 'localanvil' entry is correctly marked as a "testnet" type. However, several fields are empty:
explorerUrlexplorerApiUrlmulticallAddresssafeApiUrlConsider adding placeholder values or TODO comments for these fields to maintain consistency with other entries, even for test networks. This could help prevent issues if the configuration is used in testing environments that expect these fields to be populated.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
- .env.example (1 hunks)
- config/global.json (2 hunks)
- config/networks.json (29 hunks)
- config/tokenwrapper.json (0 hunks)
- script/deploy/facets/DeployTokenWrapper.s.sol (1 hunks)
- script/deploy/safe/config.ts (1 hunks)
- script/deploy/zksync/017_deploy_token_wrapper.ts (2 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- config/tokenwrapper.json
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- .env.example
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome
config/networks.json
[error] 452-452: Expected an array, an object, or a literal but instead found ','.
Expected an array, an object, or a literal here.
(parse)
🔇 Additional comments (12)
script/deploy/facets/DeployTokenWrapper.s.sol (1)
26-26: LGTM. Verify impact of configuration file change.The change from
tokenwrapper.jsontonetworks.jsonaligns with the PR objectives. This suggests a move towards a more centralized configuration file for network-specific information.To ensure this change doesn't break other parts of the codebase, please run the following script:
✅ Verification successful
Configuration file path successfully updated with no residual references.
All references to
tokenwrapper.jsonhave been removed, and the new configuration fileconfig/networks.jsonexists as expected.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining references to the old configuration file # Test: Search for references to the old file name rg --type solidity "tokenwrapper\.json" # Test: Verify the existence of the new configuration file if [ -f "config/networks.json" ]; then echo "networks.json exists" else echo "Error: networks.json not found" fiLength of output: 159
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining references to the old configuration file without specifying file types # Test: Search for references to the old file name in all files rg "tokenwrapper\.json" # Test: Verify the existence of the new configuration file if [ -f "config/networks.json" ]; then echo "networks.json exists" else echo "Error: networks.json not found" fiLength of output: 110
script/deploy/zksync/017_deploy_token_wrapper.ts (3)
Line range hint
1-70: Summary of changes and testing recommendation.The main changes in this file involve updating import paths and modifying how configuration data is accessed. While these changes don't alter the core functionality of the deployment script, they suggest a broader restructuring of the project.
To ensure these changes don't introduce any unintended consequences:
- Thoroughly test the deployment script on a test network to verify it still functions as expected.
- Review other deployment scripts or related files to ensure consistent use of the new configuration structure.
- If this is part of a larger refactoring, consider updating the PR description to provide context for these changes.
As a final check, run the following script to identify any other files that might need similar updates:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find other files that might need similar updates # Look for other files importing from ../config or ../typechain rg --type typescript "from '\.\./config/" . rg --type typescript "from '\.\./typechain" . echo "Please review the output to identify any other files that might need similar updates."
10-10: Verify the new configuration file and data access.The changes in the configuration import and data access raise a few points to consider:
- The import path has changed from
../config/tokenwrapper.jsonto../../../config/networks.json. Ensure this new path is correct and the file exists.- The assignment of
WRAPPED_NATIVE_ADDRESSnow usesglobalConfig.zksync.wrappedNativeAddressinstead ofglobalConfig[network.name]. This change makes the script specific to the zksync network, which aligns with the network check at the beginning of the function.Please verify:
- The structure of the new
networks.jsonfile is as expected, with azksyncobject containing awrappedNativeAddressproperty.- This change is intentional and doesn't break functionality for other networks (if applicable).
- The
wrappedNativeAddressin the config file is correct for the zksync network.Run the following script to check the new configuration:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the structure and content of the new configuration file # Test 1: Check if the new config file exists if [ ! -f "../../../config/networks.json" ]; then echo "Error: ../../../config/networks.json file does not exist" exit 1 fi # Test 2: Check the structure of the networks.json file jq '.zksync.wrappedNativeAddress' ../../../config/networks.json echo "Please review the output to ensure the zksync.wrappedNativeAddress exists and is correct."Also applies to: 22-22
4-4: Verify the correctness of the new import path.The import path for
PeripheryRegistryFacethas been changed to navigate up three directory levels instead of one. Please ensure that:
- This new path is correct and the
typechaindirectory is indeed located three levels up.- This change is consistent with other files in the project that import from
typechain.- If this change is due to a project structure modification, similar updates have been made in other relevant files.
Run the following script to check for consistency:
script/deploy/safe/config.ts (1)
21-21: LGTM! Verify the new Linea Safe API URL.The update to the Linea network's Safe API URL looks good. It now follows the consistent pattern used for other networks in the
safeApiUrlsobject.To ensure the new URL is functional, please run the following verification script:
This command will perform a HEAD request to the API's about endpoint. Ensure that it returns a successful status code (e.g., 200 OK).
✅ Verification successful
Please run the following verification script to ensure the redirected Linea Safe API URL is accessible and returns a successful response:
This script uses the
-Lflag to follow any redirects and should return a200 OKstatus if the API endpoint is functioning correctly.
Success! The new Linea Safe API URL is accessible and returns a successful response.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the new Linea Safe API URL is accessible and returns a valid response. curl -I https://safe-transaction-linea.safe.global/api/v1/aboutLength of output: 835
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Follow the redirect and verify that the Linea Safe API URL with trailing slash is accessible. curl -I https://safe-transaction-linea.safe.global/api/v1/about/ -LLength of output: 1031
config/global.json (4)
96-96: Approve updated Linea Safe API URLThe Linea network's Safe API URL has been updated to follow the consistent pattern used for other networks:
"linea": "https://safe-transaction-linea.safe.global/api",This change aligns with the naming convention used for other networks and likely reflects an update in the Safe API infrastructure.
To ensure this change doesn't break any existing functionality:
- Verify that the new API endpoint is operational and returns the expected responses.
- Update any documentation or client code that may be using the old URL.
- Confirm with the Safe team that this is the correct and most up-to-date URL for the Linea network.
Line range hint
134-134: Verify the new Metis native addressThe native address for the Metis network has been changed to a distinctive address:
"metis": "0xDeadDeAddeAddEAddeadDEaDDEAdDeaDDeAD0000",This address (
0xDeadDeAd...) is often used to represent special cases like native tokens or burn addresses. Given the potential impact on native token handling for the Metis network, please:
- Confirm that this address is correct and intended for use as the native address on Metis.
- Provide documentation or references explaining the reason for this change and its implications.
- Ensure that all relevant components of the system are updated to handle this new address correctly.
Can you provide more context on why this change was made and confirm its correctness with the Metis team or documentation?
146-149: Provide details on LiFiDEXAggregator whitelistingA new contract, "LiFiDEXAggregator", has been added to the
autoWhitelistPeripheryContractsarray:"autoWhitelistPeripheryContracts": [ "FeeCollector", "LiFuelFeeCollector", "TokenWrapper", "LiFiDEXAggregator" ]Before approving this change, please provide the following information:
- What is the purpose of the LiFiDEXAggregator contract?
- What privileges or permissions does this whitelisting grant to the contract?
- Has the LiFiDEXAggregator contract been audited and verified for security?
- Are there any potential risks associated with auto-whitelisting this contract?
Can you also provide links to the contract's source code and any relevant documentation or audit reports?
Line range hint
1-150: Summary of config/global.json changesThis review has identified several important changes to the configuration:
- Duplicate
pauserWalletentries with different addresses.- Updated Safe API URL for the Linea network.
- Changed native address for the Metis network to a special address.
- Addition of "LiFiDEXAggregator" to the auto-whitelist periphery contracts.
Please address the comments for each of these changes, particularly:
- Resolve the duplicate
pauserWalletissue.- Confirm the correctness of the new Metis native address.
- Provide more information about the LiFiDEXAggregator contract and the implications of whitelisting it.
Once these points are addressed and verified, the changes can be approved.
As a final step, please run a JSON linter on the entire file to ensure there are no syntax errors or formatting issues introduced by these changes.
config/networks.json (3)
Line range hint
1-514: Overall changes look good, with some areas needing attention.The update to
networks.jsonadds valuable information for each network, including RPC URLs, explorer details, and multicall addresses. This standardization across networks is beneficial for consistency and ease of use. However, there are a few areas that require attention, which I'll detail in the following comments.🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 452-452: Expected an array, an object, or a literal but instead found ','.
Expected an array, an object, or a literal here.
(parse)
482-496: 'zksync' network entry update looks goodThe 'zksync' network entry has been successfully updated with all required information. The
multicallAddressis different from other networks, but this is likely specific to the zkSync network and not an issue.
Line range hint
1-514: Summary and next stepsThe updates to
networks.jsonsignificantly improve the configuration by adding comprehensive information for each network. The consistency across networks is commendable. However, there are a few areas that need attention:
- Complete the missing information for the 'taiko' and 'xlayer' network entries.
- Fix the incorrect
rpcUrlfor the 'mantle' network.- Consider adding placeholder values or TODO comments for empty fields in the 'localanvil' test network entry.
- Explain or populate the empty
safeAddressfields across all networks.Addressing these points will ensure that the configuration file is complete, consistent, and ready for use across various blockchain interactions.
To ensure all network entries are complete, you can run the following script:
This script will list any network entries with missing or empty required fields, helping to identify areas that need completion.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 452-452: Expected an array, an object, or a literal but instead found ','.
Expected an array, an object, or a literal here.
(parse)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
config/networks.json (4)
Line range hint
17-32: Minor inconsistency in safeApiUrl for ArbitrumThe
safeApiUrlfor Arbitrum points to Aurora instead of Arbitrum. This should be corrected.Please update the
safeApiUrlto the correct Arbitrum Safe API URL. The correct URL should be something like "https://safe-transaction-arbitrum.safe.global/api".
Line range hint
273-288: Incorrect rpcUrl for Mantle networkThe
rpcUrlfor the Mantle network is set to a multicall address instead of an actual RPC URL.Please update the
rpcUrlfor the Mantle network. The correct URL should be "https://rpc.mantle.xyz".
Line range hint
498-512: Consider adding explanatory comments for empty fields in localanvilWhile it's understandable that some fields are empty for a local test network, it might be helpful to add comments explaining why these fields are empty or how they should be populated when using this configuration.
Consider adding comments like "// Not applicable for local network" or "// To be filled based on local setup" for the empty fields in the localanvil entry.
Line range hint
1-514: Overall good update with a few issues to addressThe
networks.jsonfile has been significantly enhanced with comprehensive information for various blockchain networks. The additions and updates are mostly correct and consistent. However, there are a few issues that need to be addressed:
- The
safeApiUrlfor Arbitrum points to Aurora instead of Arbitrum.- The
rpcUrlfor the Mantle network is incorrect (set to a multicall address).- The
chainIdfor the Taiko network is missing.- The
rpcUrlfor the X Layer network is empty.Please correct these issues to ensure the accuracy and completeness of the network configurations.
Consider implementing a validation script that checks for the presence and format of required fields across all network entries. This could help catch similar issues in future updates.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- config/networks.json (29 hunks)
- script/deploy/safe/confirm-safe-tx.ts (8 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (9)
config/networks.json (3)
Line range hint
1-16: LGTM: Ethereum Mainnet configuration looks good.The added fields for the Ethereum Mainnet are correct and provide comprehensive information for interacting with the network.
Line range hint
33-448: LGTM: Network configurations look good overallThe network configurations for Aurora, Avalanche, Base, Blast, Boba, BSC, Celo, Fantom, Fraxtal, Fuse, Gnosis, Gravity, Immutable zkEVM, Kaia, Linea, Metis, Mode, Moonbeam, Moonriver, Optimism, Polygon, Polygon zkEVM, Rootstock, Scroll, and Sei have been correctly updated with the new fields and appear to contain accurate information.
482-496: LGTM: zkSync Era Mainnet configuration looks goodThe updated zkSync Era Mainnet configuration is comprehensive and appears to contain accurate information for all fields.
script/deploy/safe/confirm-safe-tx.ts (6)
11-13: Addition of dotenv for environment variable managementThe inclusion of
dotenvto manage environment variables enhances configuration flexibility. Ensure that the.envfile is securely stored and excluded from version control to protect sensitive information.
100-102: Added informative logging statementsLogging the chain name and signer address improves transparency and aids in debugging. This enhancement is beneficial for tracking the transaction flow.
134-142: Implementation ofexecuteTransactionfunctionThe
executeTransactionfunction correctly handles the execution and confirmation of transactions. This modular approach improves code readability and maintainability.
211-211: Updated transaction action optionsThe action options now include 'Sign & Execute Now', 'Sign', and 'Execute Now', providing users with more control over transaction processing.
264-264: MadeprivateKeyargument optionalChanging the
privateKeyargument to optional enhances flexibility, allowing users to supply it via command-line arguments or environment variables.
270-285: Interactive private key selection from environment variablesThe script now prompts the user to select a private key from the
.envfile if none is provided. This improves usability but ensure robust error handling for missing or invalid keys.Run the following script to check for all usages of
process.envand confirm that sensitive data handling is appropriate:✅ Verification successful
Private Key Environment Variable Handling Verified
The selections and error handling for private keys in
script/deploy/safe/confirm-safe-tx.tslines 270-285 are properly managed. The script ensures that a private key is either provided or selected from environment variables, with appropriate error handling for missing keys.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify usages of process.env for environment variables. # Test: Search for all occurrences of 'process.env'. Expect: Proper handling of undefined or empty values. rg --type js --type ts 'process\.env' -A 2Length of output: 6859
…tools-improvements
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
config/networks.json (4)
121-128: LGTM: BNB Smart Chain configuration looks good, but consider RPC choiceThe new fields for BNB Smart Chain have been correctly added and populated with appropriate values. However, note that the RPC URL uses an Ankr endpoint instead of the official BSC endpoint. While Ankr is a reputable provider, you might want to consider using the official BSC RPC URL for consistency with other networks.
153-160: LGTM: Fantom configuration looks good, but consider RPC choiceThe new fields for Fantom have been correctly added and populated with appropriate values. However, note that the RPC URL uses an Ankr endpoint instead of the official Fantom endpoint. While Ankr is a reputable provider, you might want to consider using the official Fantom RPC URL for consistency with other networks.
329-336: LGTM: Moonbeam configuration looks good, but consider RPC choiceThe new fields for Moonbeam have been correctly added and populated with appropriate values. However, note that the RPC URL uses a Blast API endpoint instead of the official Moonbeam RPC. While Blast is a reputable provider, you might want to consider using the official Moonbeam RPC URL for consistency with other networks.
345-352: LGTM: Moonriver configuration looks good, but consider RPC choiceThe new fields for Moonriver have been correctly added and populated with appropriate values. However, note that the RPC URL uses a Blast API endpoint instead of the official Moonriver RPC. While Blast is a reputable provider, you might want to consider using the official Moonriver RPC URL for consistency with other networks.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- config/global.json (1 hunks)
- config/networks.json (30 hunks)
- script/deploy/safe/config.ts (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- config/global.json
- script/deploy/safe/config.ts
🔇 Additional comments (23)
config/networks.json (23)
9-16: LGTM: Ethereum Mainnet configuration looks goodThe new fields for the Ethereum Mainnet have been correctly added and populated with appropriate values. The use of a decentralized RPC provider (drpc.org) is a good choice for reliability.
25-32: LGTM: Arbitrum One configuration looks goodThe new fields for Arbitrum One have been correctly added and populated with appropriate values. The official Arbitrum RPC endpoint is used, which is good for reliability.
41-48: LGTM: Aurora configuration looks goodThe new fields for Aurora have been correctly added and populated with appropriate values. The official Aurora RPC endpoint is used, which is good for reliability.
57-64: LGTM: Avalanche C-Chain configuration looks goodThe new fields for Avalanche C-Chain have been correctly added and populated with appropriate values. The official Avalanche RPC endpoint is used, which is good for reliability.
73-80: LGTM: Base configuration looks goodThe new fields for Base have been correctly added and populated with appropriate values. The official Base RPC endpoint is used, which is good for reliability.
89-96: LGTM: Blast configuration looks goodThe new fields for Blast have been correctly added and populated with appropriate values. The official Blast RPC endpoint is used, which is good for reliability.
105-112: LGTM: Boba Network configuration looks goodThe new fields for Boba Network have been correctly added and populated with appropriate values. The official Boba Network RPC endpoint is used, which is good for reliability.
137-144: LGTM: Celo configuration looks goodThe new fields for Celo have been correctly added and populated with appropriate values. The official Celo RPC endpoint is used, which is good for reliability.
169-176: LGTM with a minor concern: Fraxtal configurationThe new fields for Fraxtal have been added and mostly populated with appropriate values. However, there's a potential issue:
- The
safeApiUrlseems to be using an Optimism URL (https://transaction-frax.safe.optimism.io/api) instead of a Fraxtal-specific one. Please verify if this is correct or if it should be updated to a Fraxtal-specific Safe API URL.
185-192: LGTM with a minor concern: Fuse configurationThe new fields for Fuse have been added and mostly populated with appropriate values. However, there's a potential issue:
- The
safeApiUrlis using the same Optimism URL (https://transaction-frax.safe.optimism.io/api) as the Fraxtal network. This seems incorrect and should be updated to a Fuse-specific Safe API URL.
201-208: LGTM: Gnosis Chain configuration looks goodThe new fields for Gnosis Chain have been correctly added and populated with appropriate values. The official Gnosis Chain RPC endpoint is used, which is good for reliability.
217-224: LGTM with verification needed: Gravity Bridge configurationThe new fields for Gravity Bridge have been added and populated. However, there are some points that need verification:
- The network is marked as "inactive". Please confirm if this is intentional.
- The explorer URL and Safe API URL use a different domain (gravity.xyz) than the RPC URL. Please verify if this is correct.
- The multicall address is different from the standard one used in most other networks. Please confirm if this is intentional.
233-240: LGTM with verification needed: Immutable zkEVM configurationThe new fields for Immutable zkEVM have been added and populated. However, there are some points that need verification:
- The network is marked as "inactive". Please confirm if this is intentional.
- The multicall address is different from the standard one used in most other networks. Please confirm if this is correct for Immutable zkEVM.
249-256: LGTM with verification needed: Kaia configurationThe new fields for Kaia have been added and populated. However, there are some points that need verification:
- The network is marked as "inactive". Please confirm if this is intentional.
- The explorer URL (kaiascope.com) and the explorer API URL (klaytnscope.com) use different domains. Please verify if this is correct.
- The Safe API URL uses a different domain (kaia.io) than the explorer. Please confirm if this is intentional.
265-272: LGTM: Linea configuration looks goodThe new fields for Linea have been correctly added and populated with appropriate values. The official Linea RPC endpoint is used, which is good for reliability.
297-304: LGTM: Metis Andromeda Mainnet configuration looks goodThe new fields for Metis Andromeda Mainnet have been correctly added and populated with appropriate values. The official Metis RPC endpoint is used, which is good for reliability.
313-320: LGTM with a minor concern: Mode configurationThe new fields for Mode have been added and mostly populated with appropriate values. However, there's a potential issue:
- The
safeApiUrlis using an Optimism URL (https://transaction-mode.safe.optimism.io/api). Please verify if this is correct or if it should be updated to a Mode-specific Safe API URL.
361-368: LGTM: Optimism configuration looks goodThe new fields for Optimism have been correctly added and populated with appropriate values. The official Optimism RPC endpoint is used, which is good for reliability.
377-384: LGTM: Polygon configuration looks goodThe new fields for Polygon have been correctly added and populated with appropriate values. The official Polygon RPC endpoint is used, which is good for reliability.
393-400: LGTM: Polygon zkEVM configuration looks goodThe new fields for Polygon zkEVM have been correctly added and populated with appropriate values. The official Polygon zkEVM RPC endpoint is used, which is good for reliability.
409-416: LGTM with a minor concern: Rootstock configurationThe new fields for Rootstock have been added and mostly populated with appropriate values. However, there's an item that needs attention:
- The
safeAddressfield is empty. Please verify if this is intentional or if a Safe address should be provided for Rootstock.Also, note that the explorer type is set to "blockscout" instead of "etherscan", which is correct for Rootstock.
425-432: LGTM: Scroll configuration looks goodThe new fields for Scroll have been correctly added and populated with appropriate values. The official Scroll RPC endpoint is used, which is good for reliability.
441-448: LGTM with verification needed: Sei Network configurationThe new fields for Sei Network have been added and populated. However, there are some points that need verification:
- The explorer URL and API URL use a different domain (seitrace.com) than the RPC URL. Please verify if this is correct.
- The Safe API URL uses a different domain (protofire.io) than the explorer and RPC URLs. Please confirm if this is intentional and correct for Sei Network.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
config/networks.json (1)
Inconsistent Address Formatting Detected
Several address fields contain uppercase characters, which should be standardized to lowercase for consistency:
- Line 7:
"wrappedNativeAddress": "0xC02aaA39b223FE8D0A0e5C4F27eAD9083C756Cc2"- Line 39:
"wrappedNativeAddress": "0xC9BdeEd33CD01541e1eeD10f90519d2C06Fe3feB"- Line 48:
"safeAddress": "0xC7291F249424A35b17976F057D2C97B30c92b88C"- Line 55:
"wrappedNativeAddress": "0xB31f66AA3C1e785363F0875A1B74E27b85FD66c7"- Line 215:
"wrappedNativeAddress": "0xBB859E225ac8Fb6BE1C7e38D87b767e95Fef0EbD"- Line 293:
"nativeAddress": "0xDeadDeAddeAddEAddeadDEaDDEAdDeaDDeAD0000"- Line 336:
"safeAddress": "0xB51E43CeCAB8A42cD6225e16C9C3a3ba1A76871A"- Line 455:
"wrappedNativeAddress": "0xA51894664A773981C6C112C43ce576f315d5b1B6"- Line 494:
"multicallAddress": "0xF9cda624FBC7e059355ce98a31693d299FACd963"Please update these addresses to all lowercase to ensure consistency across the configuration.
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-512: Overall improvements and final checksThe updates to this configuration file have significantly improved its comprehensiveness and consistency. Great job on standardizing the structure across all networks!
A few final points to consider:
- Verify the 'inactive' status for networks like gravity and immutablezkevm. Ensure this status is up-to-date and intentional.
- Double-check if any relevant networks are missing from this configuration.
- Consider if any deprecated or unused networks should be removed to keep the file concise.
- The consistent use of lowercase for addresses is good practice. Ensure this is maintained in future updates.
Run the following script to check for any inconsistencies in address formatting:
This script will help identify any addresses that contain uppercase characters, which should be avoided for consistency.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for uppercase characters in address fields grep -nE '"(nativeAddress|wrappedNativeAddress|multicallAddress|safeAddress)": "0x[A-F]' config/networks.jsonLength of output: 777
script/utils/viemScriptHelpers.ts (1)
31-33: Enhance the error message for missing networksThe current error message informs the user that the chain does not exist and suggests checking
config/networks.json. For a better developer experience, consider listing the available network names or providing more detailed guidance on how to add a new network.script/deploy/safe/confirm-safe-tx.ts (1)
Line range hint
146-153: Add Error Handling in 'executeTransaction' FunctionThe
executeTransactionfunction correctly executes the transaction:async function executeTransaction( txToConfirm: SafeMultisigTransactionResponse ) { consola.info('Executing transaction', txToConfirm.safeTxHash) const exec = await protocolKit.executeTransaction(txToConfirm) await exec.transactionResponse?.wait() consola.success('Transaction executed', txToConfirm.safeTxHash) }However, consider adding error handling to manage cases where transaction execution might fail due to network issues or other errors. This will enhance the robustness of the script.
Apply this diff to add try-catch blocks for better error management:
async function executeTransaction( txToConfirm: SafeMultisigTransactionResponse ) { consola.info('Executing transaction', txToConfirm.safeTxHash) + try { const exec = await protocolKit.executeTransaction(txToConfirm) await exec.transactionResponse?.wait() consola.success('Transaction executed', txToConfirm.safeTxHash) + } catch (error) { + consola.error('Transaction execution failed', error) + throw error + } }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- config/networks.json (31 hunks)
- script/deploy/safe/confirm-safe-tx.ts (3 hunks)
- script/utils/viemScriptHelpers.ts (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
config/networks.json (3)
Line range hint
1-512: LGTM: Consistent structure and new fields added across all networksThe update adds several new fields to all network configurations, improving the completeness of the information. The structure is consistent, which is excellent for maintainability.
However, please verify that the 'type' field is correct for all networks. It's set to "mainnet" for all except localanvil, which is set to "testnet". Ensure this accurately reflects the nature of each network, especially for any potential testnet configurations.
450-464: New networks added: Taiko and X LayerThe addition of Taiko and X Layer networks is well-structured and consistent with other network entries. This expands the supported networks, which is great for interoperability.
Please ensure that all the provided information (chainId, addresses, URLs, etc.) for these new networks is accurate and up-to-date. It's especially important to verify this information for newer or less established networks.
Also applies to: 466-480
282-282: Network-specific updates and localanvil configuration
- The Mantle network's rpcUrl has been updated to use a DRPC endpoint, which is good for reliability.
- The Sei network configuration has been updated with mainnet information, which is appropriate given its recent mainnet launch.
- The localanvil network configuration has empty fields for explorer, safe, and multicall information. This is generally appropriate for a local test network, but please confirm if the empty multicallAddress is intentional, as this might be needed for local testing.
Can you confirm if the empty multicallAddress for localanvil is intentional? If a multicall address is typically used in local testing, consider adding a placeholder or default value.
Also applies to: 441-448, 505-512
script/deploy/safe/confirm-safe-tx.ts (3)
Line range hint
224-235: Remove Unreachable Code for 'Sign & Execute Later' ActionThe action
'Sign & Execute Later'is no longer presented to the user in the options:options: ['Sign & Execute Now', 'Sign', 'Execute Now'],However, the code still includes a block handling this action:
if (action === 'Sign & Execute Later') { // ... }Since this block is now unreachable, it should be removed to clean up the code and prevent confusion.
Line range hint
277-291: Ensure Secure Handling of Private KeysThe script prompts the user to select a private key from environment variables if none is provided as an argument:
const key = await consola.prompt( 'Which private key do you want to use from your .env file?', { type: 'select', options: ['PRIVATE_KEY_PRODUCTION', 'SAFE_SIGNER_PRIVATE_KEY'], } )Ensure that:
- The environment variables
PRIVATE_KEY_PRODUCTIONandSAFE_SIGNER_PRIVATE_KEYare securely stored and accessed.- The private keys are not exposed in logs, error messages, or any unintended outputs.
- Adequate error handling is in place if the environment variables are missing or empty.
Consider reviewing the method of handling private keys to align with best security practices, such as using secure credential management systems if applicable.
Line range hint
259-263: Verify Handling of Optional 'privateKey' ArgumentThe
privateKeyargument is now marked as optional:privateKey: { type: 'string', description: 'Private key of the signer', required: false, },Ensure that all code paths correctly handle cases when the
privateKeyis not provided. Specifically, verify that:
- The script prompts the user appropriately and provides clear instructions.
- The absence of a private key does not lead to unexpected errors or undefined behavior.
- All subsequent operations that depend on the
privateKeyhave the necessary checks.
Test Coverage ReportLine Coverage: 75.15% (1576 / 2097 lines) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
config/networks.json (2)
10-10: Consider documenting the use of DRPC for Ethereum Mainnet RPC URL.The Ethereum Mainnet RPC URL is set to use DRPC (https://eth.drpc.org). This might be a deliberate choice for improved reliability or performance. Consider adding a comment or documentation to explain this choice, especially if it differs from other networks or previous configurations.
Line range hint
1-512: Consider documenting RPC provider choices and verification types.There's a variation in RPC providers across networks, with some using DRPC (e.g., Ethereum, Arbitrum, Mantle) while others use network-specific URLs. Additionally, most networks use "etherscan" for verification, but some use "blockscout". Consider adding documentation to explain:
- The rationale behind using different RPC providers for certain networks.
- The criteria for choosing between "etherscan" and "blockscout" for verification.
This documentation would improve maintainability and help future contributors understand the configuration choices.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- config/networks.json (31 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (5)
config/networks.json (5)
Line range hint
1-512: Overall structure and consistency look good.The file has been updated with a consistent structure across all network entries. New fields such as
rpcUrl,verificationType,explorerUrl,explorerApiUrl,multicallAddress,safeApiUrl, andsafeAddresshave been added to each network configuration. This consistency improves the maintainability and usability of the configuration file.
450-464: Taiko network entry is complete and correct.The Taiko network entry has been added with all required fields, including the correct
chainId(167000). This resolves the previous issue of the missingchainId. The entry is consistent with other network configurations and appears to be ready for use.
Line range hint
465-480: X Layer network entry is complete and correct.The X Layer network entry has been added with all required fields, including the
rpcUrl. This resolves the previous issue of the missing RPC URL. The entry is consistent with other network configurations and appears to be ready for use.
282-282: Mantle network RPC URL has been corrected.The
rpcUrlfor the Mantle network has been updated to a correct RPC URL (https://mantle.drpc.org), resolving the previous issue where it contained a multicall address. This correction ensures proper connectivity to the Mantle network.
Line range hint
1-512: Overall, the networks.json file is well-structured and complete.The updated
networks.jsonfile demonstrates significant improvements:
- Consistent structure across all network entries.
- Addition of new fields (
rpcUrl,verificationType, etc.) to enhance network configurations.- Successful integration of new networks (Taiko and X Layer) with complete information.
- Resolution of previously identified issues (e.g., Mantle RPC URL, Taiko chainId).
The file appears ready for use, with only minor suggestions for additional documentation to improve long-term maintainability.
Which Jira task belongs to this PR?
Why did I implement it this way?
Checklist before requesting a review
Checklist for reviewer (DO NOT DEPLOY and contracts BEFORE CHECKING THIS!!!)