-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 492
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
BOLT 2: peers need to check each other's dust limit #696
Labels
Comments
t-bast
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 11, 2021
Since HTLCs below this amount will not appear in the commitment tx, they are effectively converted to miner fees. The peer could use this to grief you by broadcasting its commitment once it contains a lot of dust HTLCs. Fixes #696
t-bast
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 31, 2021
Since HTLCs below this amount will not appear in the commitment tx, they are effectively converted to miner fees. The peer could use this to grief you by broadcasting its commitment once it contains a lot of dust HTLCs. Fixes #696
t-bast
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 15, 2021
Since HTLCs below this amount will not appear in the commitment tx, they are effectively converted to miner fees. The peer could use this to grief you by broadcasting its commitment once it contains a lot of dust HTLCs. Fixes #696
t-bast
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 6, 2021
Since HTLCs below this amount will not appear in the commitment tx, they are effectively converted to miner fees. The peer could use this to grief you by broadcasting its commitment once it contains a lot of dust HTLCs. Add network dust thresholds computation details, as implemented in Bitcoin Core's default relay policy. Drop non-segwit support in shutdown: this allows dust limit to go as low as 354 sats without creating relay issues with default node policies. We add a requirement that dust limit cannot be lower than 354 sats. This ensures implementers don't have to figure this subtlety on their own. Fixes #696 and #905
3 tasks
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Because HTLCs below this amount are not enforceable, the peer could grief you by setting it high the dropping to chain. The miners will benefit, not them, but it's still a potential loss.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: