Merge pull request #2824 from shuoer86/main

Fix typos

CONTRIBUTING.md

@@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ Security
 --------
 
 Security is the primary focus of `rust-lightning`; disclosure of security
-vulnerabilites helps prevent user loss of funds. If you believe a vulnerability
+vulnerabilities helps prevent user loss of funds. If you believe a vulnerability
 may affect other Lightning implementations, please inform them.
 
 You can find further information on submitting (possible) vulnerabilities in the

lightning-invoice/src/ser.rs

@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ impl<'a, W: WriteBase32> BytesToBase32<'a, W> {
 		}
 
 		// Combine all bits from buffer with enough bits from this rounds byte so that they fill
-		// a u5. Save reamining bits from byte to buffer.
+		// a u5. Save remaining bits from byte to buffer.
 		let from_buffer = self.buffer >> 3;
 		let from_byte = byte >> (3 + self.buffer_bits); // buffer_bits <= 4
 

lightning/src/ln/peer_handler.rs

@@ -1609,7 +1609,7 @@ impl<Descriptor: SocketDescriptor, CM: Deref, RM: Deref, OM: Deref, L: Deref, CM
 		}
 
 		if let wire::Message::GossipTimestampFilter(_msg) = message {
-			// When supporting gossip messages, start inital gossip sync only after we receive
+			// When supporting gossip messages, start initial gossip sync only after we receive
 			// a GossipTimestampFilter
 			if peer_lock.their_features.as_ref().unwrap().supports_gossip_queries() &&
 				!peer_lock.sent_gossip_timestamp_filter {
@@ -2216,7 +2216,7 @@ impl<Descriptor: SocketDescriptor, CM: Deref, RM: Deref, OM: Deref, L: Deref, CM
 											log_pubkey!(node_id));
 									}
 									// We do not have the peers write lock, so we just store that we're
-									// about to disconenct the peer and do it after we finish
+									// about to disconnect the peer and do it after we finish
 									// processing most messages.
 									let msg = msg.map(|msg| wire::Message::<<<CMH as core::ops::Deref>::Target as wire::CustomMessageReader>::CustomMessage>::Error(msg));
 									peers_to_disconnect.insert(node_id, msg);
@@ -2225,7 +2225,7 @@ impl<Descriptor: SocketDescriptor, CM: Deref, RM: Deref, OM: Deref, L: Deref, CM
 									log_trace!(logger, "Handling DisconnectPeer HandleError event in peer_handler for node {} with message {}",
 										log_pubkey!(node_id), msg.data);
 									// We do not have the peers write lock, so we just store that we're
-									// about to disconenct the peer and do it after we finish
+									// about to disconnect the peer and do it after we finish
 									// processing most messages.
 									peers_to_disconnect.insert(node_id, Some(wire::Message::Warning(msg)));
 								},

lightning/src/routing/router.rs

@@ -2706,7 +2706,7 @@ where L::Target: Logger {
 						}
 					}
 
-					// Means we succesfully traversed from the payer to the payee, now
+					// Means we successfully traversed from the payer to the payee, now
 					// save this path for the payment route. Also, update the liquidity
 					// remaining on the used hops, so that we take them into account
 					// while looking for more paths.
@@ -7803,7 +7803,7 @@ mod tests {
 	fn do_min_htlc_overpay_violates_max_htlc(blinded_payee: bool) {
 		// Test that if overpaying to meet a later hop's min_htlc and causes us to violate an earlier
 		// hop's max_htlc, we don't consider that candidate hop valid. Previously we would add this hop
-		// to `targets` and build an invalid path with it, and subsquently hit a debug panic asserting
+		// to `targets` and build an invalid path with it, and subsequently hit a debug panic asserting
 		// that the used liquidity for a hop was less than its available liquidity limit.
 		let secp_ctx = Secp256k1::new();
 		let logger = Arc::new(ln_test_utils::TestLogger::new());
@@ -8452,7 +8452,7 @@ pub(crate) mod bench_utils {
 							}
 							break;
 						}
-						// If we couldn't find a path with a higer amount, reduce and try again.
+						// If we couldn't find a path with a higher amount, reduce and try again.
 						score_amt /= 100;
 					}
 

lightning/src/util/wakers.rs

@@ -491,7 +491,7 @@ mod tests {
 	}
 
 	// Rather annoyingly, there's no safe way in Rust std to construct a Waker despite it being
-	// totally possible to construct from a trait implementation (though somewhat less effecient
+	// totally possible to construct from a trait implementation (though somewhat less efficient
 	// compared to a raw VTable). Instead, we have to write out a lot of boilerplate to build a
 	// waker, which we do here with a trivial Arc<AtomicBool> data element to track woke-ness.
 	const WAKER_V_TABLE: RawWakerVTable = RawWakerVTable::new(waker_clone, wake, wake_by_ref, drop);