Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Build failure with GCC-15 #232

Open
orlitzky opened this issue Sep 6, 2024 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #233
Open

Build failure with GCC-15 #232

orlitzky opened this issue Sep 6, 2024 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #233

Comments

@orlitzky
Copy link
Contributor

orlitzky commented Sep 6, 2024

We've started build testing everything with the pre-release versions of gcc-15 to get a head start on the breakage. This one looks new:

In file included from ../src/kernel/recint/rdiv.h:48,
                 from ../src/kernel/recint/rint.h:53,
                 from test-rint_arith.C:17:
../src/kernel/recint/rfiddling.h: In static member function ‘static RecInt::rint<K> RecInt::rint<K>::maxFFLAS()’:
../src/kernel/recint/rfiddling.h:170:29: error: ‘class RecInt::rint<K>’ has no member named ‘Low’ [-Wtemplate-body[https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/C_002b_002b-Dialect-Options.html#index-Wno-template-body]]
  170 |         set_highest_bit(max.Low.Value);
      |                             ^~~

The full build log was posted to our bug tracker at https://bugs.gentoo.org/939096

d-torrance added a commit to d-torrance/givaro that referenced this issue Oct 3, 2024
max is an rint, which doesn't have a "Low" member.  But max.Value,
which is an ruint, does.

Closes: linbox-team#232
@d-torrance d-torrance linked a pull request Oct 3, 2024 that will close this issue
d-torrance added a commit to d-torrance/givaro that referenced this issue Oct 3, 2024
max is an rint, which doesn't have a "Low" member.  But max.Value,
which is an ruint, does.

Closes: linbox-team#232
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant