Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: tests using wrong int type #4

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 26, 2024

Conversation

cxdy
Copy link
Member

@cxdy cxdy commented Aug 26, 2024

need to specify int32 for these, Go assumes int if not specified

@cxdy cxdy merged commit 6edf5fa into linode-obs:main Aug 26, 2024
10 of 15 checks passed
@cxdy cxdy deleted the feat/kafkareceiver-fetch-configurable branch August 26, 2024 18:46
cxdy pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 19, 2024
… Histo --> Histogram (open-telemetry#33824)

## Description

This PR adds a custom metric function to the transformprocessor to
convert exponential histograms to explicit histograms.

Link to tracking issue: Resolves open-telemetry#33827

**Function Name**
```
convert_exponential_histogram_to_explicit_histogram
```

**Arguments:**

- `distribution` (_upper, midpoint, uniform, random_)
- `ExplicitBoundaries: []float64`

**Usage example:**

```yaml
processors:
  transform:
    error_mode: propagate
    metric_statements:
    - context: metric
      statements:
        - convert_exponential_histogram_to_explicit_histogram("random", [10.0, 20.0, 30.0, 40.0, 50.0, 60.0, 70.0, 80.0, 90.0, 100.0]) 
```

**Converts:**

```
Resource SchemaURL: 
ScopeMetrics #0
ScopeMetrics SchemaURL: 
InstrumentationScope  
Metric #0
Descriptor:
     -> Name: response_time
     -> Description: 
     -> Unit: 
     -> DataType: ExponentialHistogram
     -> AggregationTemporality: Delta
ExponentialHistogramDataPoints #0
Data point attributes:
     -> metric_type: Str(timing)
StartTimestamp: 1970-01-01 00:00:00 +0000 UTC
Timestamp: 2024-07-31 09:35:25.212037 +0000 UTC
Count: 44
Sum: 999.000000
Min: 40.000000
Max: 245.000000
Bucket (32.000000, 64.000000], Count: 10
Bucket (64.000000, 128.000000], Count: 22
Bucket (128.000000, 256.000000], Count: 12
        {"kind": "exporter", "data_type": "metrics", "name": "debug"}
```

**To:**

```
Resource SchemaURL: 
ScopeMetrics #0
ScopeMetrics SchemaURL: 
InstrumentationScope  
Metric #0
Descriptor:
     -> Name: response_time
     -> Description: 
     -> Unit: 
     -> DataType: Histogram
     -> AggregationTemporality: Delta
HistogramDataPoints #0
Data point attributes:
     -> metric_type: Str(timing)
StartTimestamp: 1970-01-01 00:00:00 +0000 UTC
Timestamp: 2024-07-30 21:37:07.830902 +0000 UTC
Count: 44
Sum: 999.000000
Min: 40.000000
Max: 245.000000
ExplicitBounds #0: 10.000000
ExplicitBounds #1: 20.000000
ExplicitBounds #2: 30.000000
ExplicitBounds #3: 40.000000
ExplicitBounds #4: 50.000000
ExplicitBounds #5: 60.000000
ExplicitBounds open-telemetry#6: 70.000000
ExplicitBounds open-telemetry#7: 80.000000
ExplicitBounds open-telemetry#8: 90.000000
ExplicitBounds open-telemetry#9: 100.000000
Buckets #0, Count: 0
Buckets #1, Count: 0
Buckets #2, Count: 0
Buckets #3, Count: 2
Buckets #4, Count: 5
Buckets #5, Count: 0
Buckets open-telemetry#6, Count: 3
Buckets open-telemetry#7, Count: 7
Buckets open-telemetry#8, Count: 2
Buckets open-telemetry#9, Count: 4
Buckets open-telemetry#10, Count: 21
        {"kind": "exporter", "data_type": "metrics", "name": "debug"}
```

### Testing

- Several unit tests have been created. We have also tested by ingesting
and converting exponential histograms from the `statsdreceiver` as well
as directly via the `otlpreceiver` over grpc over several hours with a
large amount of data.

- We have clients that have been running this solution in production for
a number of weeks.

### Readme description:

### convert_exponential_hist_to_explicit_hist

`convert_exponential_hist_to_explicit_hist([ExplicitBounds])`

the `convert_exponential_hist_to_explicit_hist` function converts an
ExponentialHistogram to an Explicit (_normal_) Histogram.

`ExplicitBounds` is represents the list of bucket boundaries for the new
histogram. This argument is __required__ and __cannot be empty__.

__WARNING:__

The process of converting an ExponentialHistogram to an Explicit
Histogram is not perfect and may result in a loss of precision. It is
important to define an appropriate set of bucket boundaries to minimize
this loss. For example, selecting Boundaries that are too high or too
low may result histogram buckets that are too wide or too narrow,
respectively.

---------

Co-authored-by: Kent Quirk <kentquirk@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Tyler Helmuth <12352919+TylerHelmuth@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant