Reorganize folder structure, improve build procedure #31
Conversation
|
I like the overall idea but somehow the "binaries" feels wrong.... maybe "baremetal" fits better? |
|
I tried to find good one name for this :) Going to rename. |
|
@oliv3r sorry, my mistake, I just copy-paste header from file to file. |
|
@semlanik: to keep the merge clean, can you squash the fixes into the corresponding commits? |
|
@amery, done. |
semlanik
force-pushed
the
master
branch
3 times, most recently
from
b6870e6 to
18ff793
Compare
|
I updated installation rules to support prefixes |
semlanik
force-pushed
the
master
branch
2 times, most recently
from
4a1e54d to
21e6bf7
Compare
|
Hi, Regards, |
|
I'm actually waiting for other people to comment.... |
| nand-part | ||
| meminfo | ||
| *.o | ||
| *.swp |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Why were these dropped? Won't binaries / .o start showing on git status now?
|
Those are some small comments from having a quick look at it, I haven't tested it yet but it looks promising 👍 |
|
Hi, thanks! Will fix comments ASAP. Regards, |
|
Done |
|
you destroyed the intermediate changes :-\ this made sense in 3 commits. also, git diff -M origin/master.. shows a couple of |
|
@semlanik: the default target is also wrong... |
|
Sorry for history, I will rebase branch once you will give "green lite". |
Use empty default prefix
|
@amery Argh, I'm sorry so much. Looks like I removed huge part of comments. I'm idiot.... |
|
Hi guys, |
|
Overal it looks good; needs some testing though? |
|
This old pull request did not seem to have moved anywhere and now even can't be applied to the current git. Should we just close it? |
Hi,
I improved build procedure, without using any autotools etc.
In README there are build insturctions