Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make eslint peer dependency less strict #2

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Feb 28, 2024

Conversation

sgraczyk
Copy link
Contributor

Description 📝

  • Summary of Change: Updated dependencies to make eslint peer dependency less strict and updated package version from 1.0.0 to 1.1.0. Adjusted various devDependencies to their newer versions and modified the LICENSE year.

Type of Change 🔄

  • Bug fix 🐛
  • New feature 🆕
  • Breaking change ❗
  • Documentation update 📚

Possible Regressions or Risks ⚠️

  • Areas or Components Potentially Affected: Dependency resolution for projects using this eslint plugin.
  • Potential Risks or Uncertainties: Projects using older versions of eslint might encounter compatibility issues.

How Has This Been Tested? 🧪

  • Description of Tests: Updated tests to reflect new library versions and ran the full test suite to ensure compatibility and no regressions.

Checklist ✅

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have updated or added relevant TSDocs for my changes
  • I have created new tests or updated existing tests to reflect my changes

Screenshots (if appropriate) 📸

  • N/A

Additional Notes 📋

  • Ensure to update the eslint version in your projects to avoid potential conflicts with the less strict peer dependency version.

Some fun 😄

A limerick for the coding spree,
With eslint as free as can be.
From strict to relaxed,
No more being taxed,
For a smoother dev journey, you see!

.gitignore Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@sgraczyk sgraczyk merged commit a70e368 into master Feb 28, 2024
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants