-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
release/19.x: [BOLT] Skip PLT search for zero-value weak reference symbols (#69136) #102295
Conversation
@yota9 What do you think about merging this PR to the release branch? |
@llvm/pr-subscribers-bolt Author: None (llvmbot) ChangesBackport 6c8933e Requested by: @linsinan1995 Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102295.diff 2 Files Affected:
diff --git a/bolt/lib/Rewrite/RewriteInstance.cpp b/bolt/lib/Rewrite/RewriteInstance.cpp
index 33ebae3b6e6de2..45d594ef3fa6f5 100644
--- a/bolt/lib/Rewrite/RewriteInstance.cpp
+++ b/bolt/lib/Rewrite/RewriteInstance.cpp
@@ -2143,6 +2143,14 @@ bool RewriteInstance::analyzeRelocation(
if (!Relocation::isSupported(RType))
return false;
+ auto IsWeakReference = [](const SymbolRef &Symbol) {
+ Expected<uint32_t> SymFlagsOrErr = Symbol.getFlags();
+ if (!SymFlagsOrErr)
+ return false;
+ return (*SymFlagsOrErr & SymbolRef::SF_Undefined) &&
+ (*SymFlagsOrErr & SymbolRef::SF_Weak);
+ };
+
const bool IsAArch64 = BC->isAArch64();
const size_t RelSize = Relocation::getSizeForType(RType);
@@ -2174,7 +2182,8 @@ bool RewriteInstance::analyzeRelocation(
// Section symbols are marked as ST_Debug.
IsSectionRelocation = (cantFail(Symbol.getType()) == SymbolRef::ST_Debug);
// Check for PLT entry registered with symbol name
- if (!SymbolAddress && (IsAArch64 || BC->isRISCV())) {
+ if (!SymbolAddress && !IsWeakReference(Symbol) &&
+ (IsAArch64 || BC->isRISCV())) {
const BinaryData *BD = BC->getPLTBinaryDataByName(SymbolName);
SymbolAddress = BD ? BD->getAddress() : 0;
}
diff --git a/bolt/test/AArch64/update-weak-reference-symbol.s b/bolt/test/AArch64/update-weak-reference-symbol.s
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000000..600a06b8b6d8fd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/bolt/test/AArch64/update-weak-reference-symbol.s
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+// This test checks whether BOLT can correctly handle relocations against weak symbols.
+
+// RUN: %clang %cflags -Wl,-z,notext -shared -Wl,-q %s -o %t.so
+// RUN: llvm-bolt %t.so -o %t.so.bolt
+// RUN: llvm-nm -n %t.so.bolt > %t.out.txt
+// RUN: llvm-objdump -dj .rodata %t.so.bolt >> %t.out.txt
+// RUN: FileCheck %s --input-file=%t.out.txt
+
+# CHECK: w func_1
+# CHECK: {{0+}}[[#%x,ADDR:]] W func_2
+
+# CHECK: {{.*}} <.rodata>:
+# CHECK-NEXT: {{.*}} .word 0x00000000
+# CHECK-NEXT: {{.*}} .word 0x00000000
+# CHECK-NEXT: {{.*}} .word 0x{{[0]+}}[[#ADDR]]
+# CHECK-NEXT: {{.*}} .word 0x00000000
+
+ .text
+ .weak func_2
+ .weak func_1
+ .global wow
+ .type wow, %function
+wow:
+ bl func_1
+ bl func_2
+ ret
+ .type func_2, %function
+func_2:
+ ret
+ .section .rodata
+.LC0:
+ .xword func_1
+.LC1:
+ .xword func_2
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Bugfix
LGTM
) Take a common weak reference pattern for example ``` __attribute__((weak)) void undef_weak_fun(); if (&undef_weak_fun) undef_weak_fun(); ``` In this case, an undefined weak symbol `undef_weak_fun` has an address of zero, and Bolt incorrectly changes the relocation for the corresponding symbol to symbol@PLT, leading to incorrect runtime behavior. (cherry picked from commit 6c8933e)
@linsinan1995 (or anyone else). If you would like to add a note about this fix in the release notes (completely optional). Please reply to this comment with a one or two sentence description of the fix. When you are done, please add the release:note label to this PR. |
Backport 6c8933e
Requested by: @linsinan1995