Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Reland "[Support] Assert that DomTree nodes share parent"" #102782
Reland "[Support] Assert that DomTree nodes share parent"" #102782
Changes from 2 commits
2218df4
1739628
084d025
d0b1a58
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you replace
null
with a global here to make the code not be immediate UB?Is the code iterating over
null
users or over0.000000e+00
/1.000000e+00
users? If it's the latter, than this code probably needs a larger fix, because iterating over ConstantData users is not allowed in general. (Also applies to null, but in that case a global is a plausible replacement.)There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's iterating over the ConstantData users. I'm not familiar with SLP, please advise how to fix the larger problem. (If iterating over such users is not allowed, why is there no assertion for this?)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Adding an
isa<ConstantData>(V) break;
in this function should work. (You should still keep your check, in case we're iterating over GV users.)Nobody has implemented it :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Added the extra check.