Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

release/19.x: [SLP]Check that operand of abs does not overflow before making it part of minbitwidth transformation #113146

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 2, 2024
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
16 changes: 16 additions & 0 deletions llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/SLPVectorizer.cpp
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -15440,9 +15440,25 @@ bool BoUpSLP::collectValuesToDemote(
MaskedValueIsZero(I->getOperand(1), Mask, SimplifyQuery(*DL)));
});
};
auto AbsChecker = [&](unsigned BitWidth, unsigned OrigBitWidth) {
assert(BitWidth <= OrigBitWidth && "Unexpected bitwidths!");
return all_of(E.Scalars, [&](Value *V) {
auto *I = cast<Instruction>(V);
unsigned SignBits = OrigBitWidth - BitWidth;
APInt Mask = APInt::getBitsSetFrom(OrigBitWidth, BitWidth - 1);
unsigned Op0SignBits =
ComputeNumSignBits(I->getOperand(0), *DL, 0, AC, nullptr, DT);
return SignBits <= Op0SignBits &&
((SignBits != Op0SignBits &&
!isKnownNonNegative(I->getOperand(0), SimplifyQuery(*DL))) ||
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't understand this part of the condition. What is the meaning of SignBits != Op0SignBits && !isKnownNonNegative? Should this be SignBits != Op0SignBits || isKnownNonNegative?

Though I'm not really sure why we'd be interested in handling the case where the abs is known non-negative (including also the MaskedValueIsZero check below): If it's non-negative, wouldn't we expect the abs to fold away anyway?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Right, isKnownNonNegative is meaningless here. Instead we check that the value is negative and SignBits < Op0SignBits, i.e. we do not lose signedness info when trying to truncate the operand value

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should this then check isKnownNegative rather than !isKnownNonNegative? They're not the same. I'm still confused by this code.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

!isKnownNonNegative is correct here

MaskedValueIsZero(I->getOperand(0), Mask, SimplifyQuery(*DL)));
});
};
if (ID != Intrinsic::abs) {
Operands.push_back(getOperandEntry(&E, 1));
CallChecker = CompChecker;
} else {
CallChecker = AbsChecker;
}
InstructionCost BestCost =
std::numeric_limits<InstructionCost::CostType>::max();
Expand Down
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_test_checks.py UTC_ARGS: --version 5
; RUN: opt -S --passes=slp-vectorizer < %s | FileCheck %s

define i32 @test(i32 %n) {
; CHECK-LABEL: define i32 @test(
; CHECK-SAME: i32 [[N:%.*]]) {
; CHECK-NEXT: [[ENTRY:.*:]]
; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP0:%.*]] = insertelement <2 x i32> poison, i32 [[N]], i32 0
; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP1:%.*]] = shufflevector <2 x i32> [[TMP0]], <2 x i32> poison, <2 x i32> zeroinitializer
; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP2:%.*]] = add <2 x i32> [[TMP1]], <i32 1, i32 2>
; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP3:%.*]] = zext <2 x i32> [[TMP2]] to <2 x i64>
; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP7:%.*]] = mul nuw nsw <2 x i64> [[TMP3]], <i64 273837369, i64 273837369>
; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP8:%.*]] = call <2 x i64> @llvm.abs.v2i64(<2 x i64> [[TMP7]], i1 true)
; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP4:%.*]] = trunc <2 x i64> [[TMP8]] to <2 x i32>
; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP5:%.*]] = extractelement <2 x i32> [[TMP4]], i32 0
; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP6:%.*]] = extractelement <2 x i32> [[TMP4]], i32 1
; CHECK-NEXT: [[RES1:%.*]] = add i32 [[TMP5]], [[TMP6]]
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i32 [[RES1]]
;
entry:
%n1 = add i32 %n, 1
%zn1 = zext nneg i32 %n1 to i64
%m1 = mul nuw nsw i64 %zn1, 273837369
%a1 = call i64 @llvm.abs.i64(i64 %m1, i1 true)
%t1 = trunc i64 %a1 to i32
%n2 = add i32 %n, 2
%zn2 = zext nneg i32 %n2 to i64
%m2 = mul nuw nsw i64 %zn2, 273837369
%a2 = call i64 @llvm.abs.i64(i64 %m2, i1 true)
%t2 = trunc i64 %a2 to i32
%res1 = add i32 %t1, %t2
ret i32 %res1
}