-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 21
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove block contents from mempool #485
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1,9 +1,11 @@ | ||
use crate::da::blob::Blob; | ||
use bytes::Bytes; | ||
use std::hash::Hash; | ||
|
||
pub trait Attestation { | ||
type Blob: Blob; | ||
type Hash: Hash + Eq + Clone; | ||
fn blob(&self) -> <Self::Blob as Blob>::Hash; | ||
fn hash(&self) -> <Self::Blob as Blob>::Hash; | ||
fn hash(&self) -> Self::Hash; | ||
fn as_bytes(&self) -> Bytes; | ||
} | ||
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why adding the
Hash
associated type? Reasoning for using the blob one was to mark that the return hash is not the attestation/certificate/whatever but the related blob one. Which now that I think of it it makes sense at type level but maybe not so much as it cannot be enforced (neither I added documentation, completely wrong on my side).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For that we have the
blob
method. Attestations and certificates could be for the same blob but still be different (e.g. produced by different nodes) and we need a way to differentiate those.In theory we could reuse the blob type to enforce that all the items for DA use the same hash type but I could not find a way to write a generic constraint like
Attestation<Blob::Hash = T>
(rust-lang/rust#52662), so I had to add this as a separate trait instead