Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Programming exercises: Fix an issue when parsing empty files #8964

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jul 3, 2024

Conversation

Strohgelaender
Copy link
Contributor

@Strohgelaender Strohgelaender commented Jul 3, 2024

Checklist

General

Server

  • Important: I implemented the changes with a very good performance and prevented too many (unnecessary) database calls.
  • I strictly followed the server coding and design guidelines.
  • I documented the Java code using JavaDoc style.

Motivation and Context

We encountered an issue where students saw a "Failed to process build results" error.

Description

The error was caused by trying to parse an empty string, which we now filter out.

Steps for Testing

Create a new PE with language empty and a buildscript like this:
echo "" > results.xml

Test that you see a build failed results, but without any internal exceptions in the log.

Testserver States

Note

These badges show the state of the test servers.
Green = Currently available, Red = Currently locked
Click on the badges to get to the test servers.







Review Progress

Code Review

  • Code Review 1
  • Code Review 2

Manual Tests

  • Test 1
  • Test 2

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Improved handling of empty test result files by logging a warning and updating build logs accordingly.
  • Tests

    • Added a new test to validate the handling of empty test result files.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the server Pull requests that update Java code. (Added Automatically!) label Jul 3, 2024
@Strohgelaender Strohgelaender marked this pull request as ready for review July 3, 2024 16:15
@Strohgelaender Strohgelaender requested a review from a team as a code owner July 3, 2024 16:15
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 3, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes involve modifying the BuildJobExecutionService to handle empty test result files by adding a conditional check, logging a warning, and updating build logs. Additionally, a constant is added in AbstractSpringIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTest for the empty test results path, and a new test method, testEmptyResultFile, is introduced in LocalCIIntegrationTest to validate this new functionality.

Changes

Files Change Summary
.../localci/buildagent/BuildJobExecutionService.java Added a check for empty test result files, logging a warning and updating build logs if the file is empty.
.../AbstractSpringIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTest.java Introduced a new constant EMPTY_TEST_RESULTS_PATH to represent the path for empty test result files.
.../localvcci/LocalCIIntegrationTest.java Added a new test method testEmptyResultFile() to verify the handling of empty test result files in build logs and logs.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant LocalCIIntegrationTest
    participant BuildJobExecutionService

    LocalCIIntegrationTest->>BuildJobExecutionService: testEmptyResultFile()
    BuildJobExecutionService-->>BuildJobExecutionService: if (testResultFileString.isBlank())
    BuildJobExecutionService-->>BuildJobExecutionService: log.warn(msg)
    BuildJobExecutionService-->>BuildJobExecutionService: buildLogsMap.appendBuildLogEntry(buildJobId, msg)
    LocalCIIntegrationTest->>BuildJobExecutionService: assert log and buildLog entry
Loading

Tip

AI model upgrade

gpt-4o model for reviews and chat is now live

OpenAI claims that this model is better at understanding and generating code than the previous models. Please join our Discord Community to provide any feedback or to report any issues.


Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between a394ae8 and 88aca99.

Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • src/test/resources/test-data/test-results/java-gradle/empty/results.xml is excluded by !**/*.xml
Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/test/java/de/tum/in/www1/artemis/AbstractSpringIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTest.java (1 hunks)
  • src/test/java/de/tum/in/www1/artemis/localvcci/LocalCIIntegrationTest.java (1 hunks)
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (2)
src/test/java/de/tum/in/www1/artemis/AbstractSpringIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTest.java (1)

Pattern src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: true

src/test/java/de/tum/in/www1/artemis/localvcci/LocalCIIntegrationTest.java (1)

Pattern src/test/java/**/*.java: test_naming: descriptive; test_size: small_specific; fixed_data: true; junit5_features: true; assert_use: assertThat; assert_specificity: true; archunit_use: enforce_package_rules; db_query_count_tests: track_performance; util_service_factory_pattern: true; avoid_db_access: true; mock_strategy: static_mocks; context_restart_minimize: true

Additional comments not posted (2)
src/test/java/de/tum/in/www1/artemis/AbstractSpringIntegrationLocalCILocalVCTest.java (1)

143-143: Addition of EMPTY_TEST_RESULTS_PATH constant looks good.

The added constant aligns with the PR objective to handle empty test result files.

src/test/java/de/tum/in/www1/artemis/localvcci/LocalCIIntegrationTest.java (1)

382-399: New test method testEmptyResultFile looks good.

The added test method correctly verifies handling of empty test result files and follows best practices.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot previously approved these changes Jul 3, 2024
krusche
krusche previously approved these changes Jul 3, 2024
Copy link
Member

@krusche krusche left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code looks good to me 👍

@krusche krusche merged commit a6eade2 into develop Jul 3, 2024
27 of 30 checks passed
@krusche krusche deleted the bugfix/programming/emptyresults branch July 3, 2024 20:13
@krusche krusche added this to the 7.4.0 milestone Jul 3, 2024
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Nov 14, 2024
13 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ready for review server Pull requests that update Java code. (Added Automatically!) tests
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants