Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create missing statefulsets before waiting for ready #227

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 16, 2020

Conversation

robskillington
Copy link
Collaborator

This means if statefulsets go missing for whatever reason they can be recreated and nodes can bootstrap all at once instead of waiting for all replicas to be ready in a single replica before progressing to creating the next statefulset.

Very useful in disaster scenarios and/or dev when recreating statefulsets and having the nodes come back quickly after statefulset deletions.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 16, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #227 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #227   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   73.87%   73.87%           
=======================================
  Files          30       30           
  Lines        2247     2247           
=======================================
  Hits         1660     1660           
  Misses        453      453           
  Partials      134      134           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update a052641...d50b172. Read the comment docs.

@schallert schallert merged commit 53f16ed into master Jul 16, 2020
@schallert schallert deleted the r/create-missing-statefulsets-first branch July 16, 2020 15:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants