Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CI: Use new yarn cache in setup-node action #761

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 21, 2021
Merged

CI: Use new yarn cache in setup-node action #761

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 21, 2021

Conversation

oscard0m
Copy link
Contributor

@oscard0m oscard0m commented Jul 5, 2021

Description

Add cache to workflows using actions/setup-node

Context

setup-node GitHub Action just released a new option to add cache to steps using it.

You can find the details here: https://github.blog/changelog/2021-07-02-github-actions-setup-node-now-supports-dependency-caching/


🤖 This PR has been generated automatically by this octoherd script, feel free to run it in your GitHub user/org repositories! 💪🏾

.github/workflows/ci.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
.github/workflows/ci.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
.github/workflows/ci.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
.github/workflows/ci.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
.github/workflows/ci.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
.github/workflows/ci.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
.github/workflows/ci.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
.github/workflows/ci.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@oscard0m oscard0m requested a review from Turbo87 July 5, 2021 09:52
@Turbo87 Turbo87 changed the title ci(workflow): add cache to workflows using actions/setup-node CI: Use new yarn cache in setup-node action Jul 21, 2021
@Turbo87 Turbo87 merged commit a85f08d into mainmatter:master Jul 21, 2021
@oscard0m oscard0m deleted the add-cache-to-node-workflows branch July 21, 2021 09:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants