-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 211
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Any requirement for polygon ring winding ? #18
Comments
@strk We came to the conclusion in https://github.com/mapbox/tilemill/issues/2110 that the right hand rule should be applied to polygons in Tilemill. I propose we do the same for the vector tile spec. Good question about ClosePath. Requirement of it seems a little redundant since it's already implicit in the geometry type. And Mapnik closes polygons given to it already, right? |
mapnik/mapnik#2518 prevents checking the GeoJSON, so instead the feature geometry is queried manually. mapbox/mapnik-vector-tile#62 prevents MultiPoints from working with mapnik-vector-tile, so they don't work in Avecado either ref mapbox/vector-tile-spec#18
Sorry, didn't mean to close this issue -- this will serve as a great ticket for discussions on the v2 pull request #39 |
As I do not see any objections to the way winding order is described in the new specification going to go ahead and close this ticket. |
Is there any requirement for polygon holes and shell to follow a specific winding ? (clockwise/counterclockwise) ?
Do rings have to end with a ClosePath ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: