We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Link to problem area:
https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-doc/blame/16ec511e9c858b9fd49456922132f4fc389e4ddd/content/rooms/v7.md#L134-L138
Issue
Rule iv. Otherwise, reject seems to be missing on knock membership auth rule (Rule 4.6). It was present on a previous version of the spec ( https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-doc/pull/3432/files#diff-d6b46653922eec4cccb889228b3bc6a1eca1f2aaec466b486e21b734071f017eL40-L48), but it's missing since this PR was merged: #3432
iv. Otherwise, reject
Expected behaviour
The mentioned rule should be restored
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This rule seems to be missing also on room v8 and v9 which were recently merged on: #3387
Sorry, something went wrong.
I don't think it's technically required because it'll fall into unknown, thus reject, but it's very sensible to put back
unknown, thus reject
Re-add knock's otherwise, reject per MSC2403
otherwise, reject
ba9c31a
Fixes #3648
Re-add knock's otherwise, reject per MSC2403 (#3661)
4a597ac
* Re-add knock's `otherwise, reject` per MSC2403 Fixes #3648 * changelog + changelog for 3432
turt2live
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
Link to problem area:
https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-doc/blame/16ec511e9c858b9fd49456922132f4fc389e4ddd/content/rooms/v7.md#L134-L138
Issue
Rule
iv. Otherwise, reject
seems to be missing on knock membership auth rule (Rule 4.6). It was present on a previous version of the spec ( https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-doc/pull/3432/files#diff-d6b46653922eec4cccb889228b3bc6a1eca1f2aaec466b486e21b734071f017eL40-L48), but it's missing since this PR was merged: #3432Expected behaviour
The mentioned rule should be restored
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: