This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 26, 2024. It is now read-only.
-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.1k
Add a get_next_txn
method to StreamIdGenerator
to match MultiWriterIdGenerator
(#15191
#15191
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1 @@ | ||
Add a `get_next_txn` method to `StreamIdGenerator` to match `MultiWriterIdGenerator`. |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I guess this is no longer true and we're always a writer?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Mm, no, not all workers are account_data stream writers. But
self._account_data_id_gen
is always aAbstractStreamIdGenerator
, even on non-writers.The methods that rely on
self._account_data_id_gen
being aAbstractStreamIdGenerator
should not be called unless we are a writer though. Hence theassert
s in those methods, such as:synapse/synapse/storage/databases/main/account_data.py
Line 772 in c8665dd
Defining
self._account_data_id_gen
as aAbstractStreamIdTracker
confused mypy though, asAbstractStreamIdTracker
doesn't have the methods that a writer need (get_next
,get_next_txn
, etc.).mypy didn't yell about
get_next
not existing onAbstractStreamIdTracker
though, possibly because we used it inasync with ...
blocks instead of calling it directly? Does mypy check those properly?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It looks like #14468 essentially removed
AbstractStreamIdTracker
's concrete classes without removing the abstract class, which seems unfortunate.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It seems there's some confusion about making sequence generators
AbstractStreamIdTracker
in*WorkerStore
classes, where it's assumed that the same sequence generator would be anAbstractStreamIdGenerator
in the non-worker variant storage class. SeeReceiptsWorkerStore
for instance:synapse/synapse/storage/databases/main/receipts.py
Lines 66 to 68 in 9bb2eac
But
*WorkerStore
doesn't mean that that storage class can't write to the database. It just means that workers should use that class vs. the main process... right?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Also that comment is wrong,
ReceiptsStore
is just an empty class 🤦synapse/synapse/storage/databases/main/receipts.py
Lines 1066 to 1067 in 9bb2eac
Looks like there may be a few cases where
AbstractStreamIdTracker
s should actually be typed asAbstractStreamIdGenerator
s.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
#14468 made this obsolete as far as I can tell. So they just never got updated. 🤷
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
See #15192.