Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Rollup merge of rust-lang#91022 - compiler-errors:modulo_infer, r=est…
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
…ebank

Suggest `await` in more situations where infer types are involved

Currently we use `TyS::same_type` in diagnostics that suggest adding `.await` to opaque future types.

This change makes the suggestion slightly more general, when we're comparing types like `Result<T, E>` and `Result<_, _>` which happens sometimes in places like `match` patterns or `let` statements with partially-elaborated types.

----

Question:
1. Is this change worthwhile? Totally fine if it doesn't make sense adding.
2. Should `same_type_modulo_infer` live in `rustc_infer::infer::error_reporting` or alongside the other method in `rustc_middle::ty::util`?
3. Should we generalize this change? I wanted to change all usages, but I don't want erroneous suggestions when adding `.field_name`...
  • Loading branch information
matthiaskrgr authored Nov 20, 2021
2 parents 770f0b2 + 1f625b7 commit b41214f
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 3 changed files with 85 additions and 4 deletions.
34 changes: 31 additions & 3 deletions compiler/rustc_infer/src/infer/error_reporting/mod.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -310,6 +310,34 @@ pub fn unexpected_hidden_region_diagnostic(
err
}

/// Structurally compares two types, modulo any inference variables.
///
/// Returns `true` if two types are equal, or if one type is an inference variable compatible
/// with the other type. A TyVar inference type is compatible with any type, and an IntVar or
/// FloatVar inference type are compatible with themselves or their concrete types (Int and
/// Float types, respectively). When comparing two ADTs, these rules apply recursively.
pub fn same_type_modulo_infer(a: Ty<'tcx>, b: Ty<'ctx>) -> bool {
match (&a.kind(), &b.kind()) {
(&ty::Adt(did_a, substs_a), &ty::Adt(did_b, substs_b)) => {
if did_a != did_b {
return false;
}

substs_a.types().zip(substs_b.types()).all(|(a, b)| same_type_modulo_infer(a, b))
}
(&ty::Int(_), &ty::Infer(ty::InferTy::IntVar(_)))
| (&ty::Infer(ty::InferTy::IntVar(_)), &ty::Int(_) | &ty::Infer(ty::InferTy::IntVar(_)))
| (&ty::Float(_), &ty::Infer(ty::InferTy::FloatVar(_)))
| (
&ty::Infer(ty::InferTy::FloatVar(_)),
&ty::Float(_) | &ty::Infer(ty::InferTy::FloatVar(_)),
)
| (&ty::Infer(ty::InferTy::TyVar(_)), _)
| (_, &ty::Infer(ty::InferTy::TyVar(_))) => true,
_ => a == b,
}
}

impl<'a, 'tcx> InferCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
pub fn report_region_errors(&self, errors: &Vec<RegionResolutionError<'tcx>>) {
debug!("report_region_errors(): {} errors to start", errors.len());
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1761,7 +1789,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> InferCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
self.get_impl_future_output_ty(exp_found.expected),
self.get_impl_future_output_ty(exp_found.found),
) {
(Some(exp), Some(found)) if ty::TyS::same_type(exp, found) => match &cause.code {
(Some(exp), Some(found)) if same_type_modulo_infer(exp, found) => match &cause.code {
ObligationCauseCode::IfExpression(box IfExpressionCause { then, .. }) => {
diag.multipart_suggestion(
"consider `await`ing on both `Future`s",
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1793,15 +1821,15 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> InferCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
diag.help("consider `await`ing on both `Future`s");
}
},
(_, Some(ty)) if ty::TyS::same_type(exp_found.expected, ty) => {
(_, Some(ty)) if same_type_modulo_infer(exp_found.expected, ty) => {
diag.span_suggestion_verbose(
exp_span.shrink_to_hi(),
"consider `await`ing on the `Future`",
".await".to_string(),
Applicability::MaybeIncorrect,
);
}
(Some(ty), _) if ty::TyS::same_type(ty, exp_found.found) => match cause.code {
(Some(ty), _) if same_type_modulo_infer(ty, exp_found.found) => match cause.code {
ObligationCauseCode::Pattern { span: Some(span), .. }
| ObligationCauseCode::IfExpression(box IfExpressionCause { then: span, .. }) => {
diag.span_suggestion_verbose(
Expand Down
17 changes: 17 additions & 0 deletions src/test/ui/async-await/suggest-missing-await.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -54,4 +54,21 @@ async fn suggest_await_on_match_expr() {
};
}

async fn dummy_result() -> Result<(), ()> {
Ok(())
}

#[allow(unused)]
async fn suggest_await_in_generic_pattern() {
match dummy_result() {
//~^ HELP consider `await`ing on the `Future`
//~| HELP consider `await`ing on the `Future`
//~| SUGGESTION .await
Ok(_) => {}
//~^ ERROR mismatched types [E0308]
Err(_) => {}
//~^ ERROR mismatched types [E0308]
}
}

fn main() {}
38 changes: 37 additions & 1 deletion src/test/ui/async-await/suggest-missing-await.stderr
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -106,6 +106,42 @@ help: consider `await`ing on the `Future`
LL | let _x = match dummy().await {
| ++++++

error: aborting due to 5 previous errors
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> $DIR/suggest-missing-await.rs:67:9
|
LL | Ok(_) => {}
| ^^^^^ expected opaque type, found enum `Result`
|
note: while checking the return type of the `async fn`
--> $DIR/suggest-missing-await.rs:57:28
|
LL | async fn dummy_result() -> Result<(), ()> {
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ checked the `Output` of this `async fn`, expected opaque type
= note: expected opaque type `impl Future<Output = Result<(), ()>>`
found enum `Result<_, _>`
help: consider `await`ing on the `Future`
|
LL | match dummy_result().await {
| ++++++

error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> $DIR/suggest-missing-await.rs:69:9
|
LL | Err(_) => {}
| ^^^^^^ expected opaque type, found enum `Result`
|
note: while checking the return type of the `async fn`
--> $DIR/suggest-missing-await.rs:57:28
|
LL | async fn dummy_result() -> Result<(), ()> {
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ checked the `Output` of this `async fn`, expected opaque type
= note: expected opaque type `impl Future<Output = Result<(), ()>>`
found enum `Result<_, _>`
help: consider `await`ing on the `Future`
|
LL | match dummy_result().await {
| ++++++

error: aborting due to 7 previous errors

For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0308`.

0 comments on commit b41214f

Please sign in to comment.