Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Auto merge of rust-lang#12450 - cookie-s:fix-optopt-duplicate-diags, …
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
…r=llogiq

[`option_option`]: Fix duplicate diagnostics

Relates to rust-lang#12379

This `option_option` lint change skips checks against `ty`s inside `field_def`s defined by external macro to prevent duplicate diagnostics to the same span `ty` by multiple `Struct` definitions.

---

changelog: [`option_option`]: Fix duplicate diagnostics
  • Loading branch information
bors committed Mar 17, 2024
2 parents 67fa36a + 9408c59 commit d202eb6
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 3 changed files with 17 additions and 15 deletions.
4 changes: 4 additions & 0 deletions clippy_lints/src/types/mod.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -392,6 +392,10 @@ impl<'tcx> LateLintPass<'tcx> for Types {
}

fn check_field_def(&mut self, cx: &LateContext<'tcx>, field: &hir::FieldDef<'tcx>) {
if field.span.from_expansion() {
return;
}

let is_exported = cx.effective_visibilities.is_exported(field.def_id);

self.check_ty(
Expand Down
2 changes: 0 additions & 2 deletions tests/ui/option_option.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,5 +1,3 @@
//@compile-flags: -Zdeduplicate-diagnostics=yes

#![deny(clippy::option_option)]
#![allow(clippy::unnecessary_wraps, clippy::manual_unwrap_or_default)]

Expand Down
26 changes: 13 additions & 13 deletions tests/ui/option_option.stderr
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,77 +1,77 @@
error: consider using `Option<T>` instead of `Option<Option<T>>` or a custom enum if you need to distinguish all 3 cases
--> tests/ui/option_option.rs:6:10
--> tests/ui/option_option.rs:4:10
|
LL | const C: Option<Option<i32>> = None;
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
note: the lint level is defined here
--> tests/ui/option_option.rs:3:9
--> tests/ui/option_option.rs:1:9
|
LL | #![deny(clippy::option_option)]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

error: consider using `Option<T>` instead of `Option<Option<T>>` or a custom enum if you need to distinguish all 3 cases
--> tests/ui/option_option.rs:8:11
--> tests/ui/option_option.rs:6:11
|
LL | static S: Option<Option<i32>> = None;
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

error: consider using `Option<T>` instead of `Option<Option<T>>` or a custom enum if you need to distinguish all 3 cases
--> tests/ui/option_option.rs:11:13
--> tests/ui/option_option.rs:9:13
|
LL | fn input(_: Option<Option<u8>>) {}
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

error: consider using `Option<T>` instead of `Option<Option<T>>` or a custom enum if you need to distinguish all 3 cases
--> tests/ui/option_option.rs:14:16
--> tests/ui/option_option.rs:12:16
|
LL | fn output() -> Option<Option<u8>> {
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

error: consider using `Option<T>` instead of `Option<Option<T>>` or a custom enum if you need to distinguish all 3 cases
--> tests/ui/option_option.rs:19:27
--> tests/ui/option_option.rs:17:27
|
LL | fn output_nested() -> Vec<Option<Option<u8>>> {
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

error: consider using `Option<T>` instead of `Option<Option<T>>` or a custom enum if you need to distinguish all 3 cases
--> tests/ui/option_option.rs:25:30
--> tests/ui/option_option.rs:23:30
|
LL | fn output_nested_nested() -> Option<Option<Option<u8>>> {
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

error: consider using `Option<T>` instead of `Option<Option<T>>` or a custom enum if you need to distinguish all 3 cases
--> tests/ui/option_option.rs:31:8
--> tests/ui/option_option.rs:29:8
|
LL | x: Option<Option<u8>>,
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

error: consider using `Option<T>` instead of `Option<Option<T>>` or a custom enum if you need to distinguish all 3 cases
--> tests/ui/option_option.rs:36:23
--> tests/ui/option_option.rs:34:23
|
LL | fn struct_fn() -> Option<Option<u8>> {
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

error: consider using `Option<T>` instead of `Option<Option<T>>` or a custom enum if you need to distinguish all 3 cases
--> tests/ui/option_option.rs:43:22
--> tests/ui/option_option.rs:41:22
|
LL | fn trait_fn() -> Option<Option<u8>>;
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

error: consider using `Option<T>` instead of `Option<Option<T>>` or a custom enum if you need to distinguish all 3 cases
--> tests/ui/option_option.rs:48:11
--> tests/ui/option_option.rs:46:11
|
LL | Tuple(Option<Option<u8>>),
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

error: consider using `Option<T>` instead of `Option<Option<T>>` or a custom enum if you need to distinguish all 3 cases
--> tests/ui/option_option.rs:50:17
--> tests/ui/option_option.rs:48:17
|
LL | Struct { x: Option<Option<u8>> },
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

error: consider using `Option<T>` instead of `Option<Option<T>>` or a custom enum if you need to distinguish all 3 cases
--> tests/ui/option_option.rs:92:14
--> tests/ui/option_option.rs:90:14
|
LL | foo: Option<Option<Cow<'a, str>>>,
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Expand Down

0 comments on commit d202eb6

Please sign in to comment.