Rollup merge of rust-lang#121899 - shepmaster:dead-code-docs, r=wesle…

…ywiser

Document how removing a type's field can be bad and what to do instead

Related to rust-lang#119645

compiler/rustc_lint_defs/src/builtin.rs

@@ -704,6 +704,20 @@ declare_lint! {
     /// `PhantomData`.
     ///
     /// Otherwise consider removing the unused code.
+    ///
+    /// ### Limitations
+    ///
+    /// Removing fields that are only used for side-effects and never
+    /// read will result in behavioral changes. Examples of this
+    /// include:
+    ///
+    /// - If a field's value performs an action when it is dropped.
+    /// - If a field's type does not implement an auto trait
+    ///   (e.g. `Send`, `Sync`, `Unpin`).
+    ///
+    /// For side-effects from dropping field values, this lint should
+    /// be allowed on those fields. For side-effects from containing
+    /// field types, `PhantomData` should be used.
     pub DEAD_CODE,
     Warn,
     "detect unused, unexported items"