Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactored to go back to sub selects #359

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 15, 2013
Merged

Conversation

zquestz
Copy link
Contributor

@zquestz zquestz commented Apr 30, 2013

This switches back to sub selects, and also has an optimization where it doesn't do the sub select if it already knows the exact object id.

@dkharrat
Copy link

dkharrat commented May 5, 2013

@tilsammans This pull request reverts the change in #324 that caused a performance regression. Would be great if you could merge it back to master and release an update.

@tilsammans
Copy link
Contributor

I'm sorry, I missed this pull request just now. It didn't make it into 2.4.1.

I have to merge it manually anyway but I don't think that will be a problem. Should be some time in the next few days.

@tilsammans
Copy link
Contributor

Can you please rebase against master? There have been changes in this area of the code and I can see exactly what needs to stay and what needs to go. Thanks!

@zquestz
Copy link
Contributor Author

zquestz commented May 15, 2013

The commits have been rebased and pushed.

tilsammans added a commit that referenced this pull request May 15, 2013
Refactored to go back to sub selects
@tilsammans tilsammans merged commit 2f2768f into mbleigh:master May 15, 2013
@tilsammans
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you very much!

@zquestz
Copy link
Contributor Author

zquestz commented May 15, 2013

No worries sir. Gotta keep the libraries fast =)

tekniklr pushed a commit to tekniklr/acts-as-taggable-on that referenced this pull request Mar 19, 2021
Refactored to go back to sub selects
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants