feat: Add a x/wasm module
#141
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
youngjoon-lee
force-pushed
the
ft/105/stargate-wasm
branch
from
58faa91
to
2901ef0
Compare
gyuguen
reviewed
Jun 16, 2021
youngjoon-lee
changed the title
x/wasm modulex/wasm module
youngjoon-lee
force-pushed
the
ft/105/stargate-wasm
branch
from
1e6e60e
to
60aae13
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
CAUTION!!!!
Merge this PR directly to the
master, after thestargatebranch is merged to themaster.It's because this PR is not the part of the issue #108.
Changes
The Starport has a command:
starport module import wasm, but unfortunately, it doesn't work well. Also, it's based on the old CosmWasm v0.14.So, I imported CosmWasm v0.17 manually by referring to https://github.com/CosmWasm/wasmd/blob/v0.17.0/app/app.go
I tested it manually using the Escrow example.