Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update version for the next release (v0.20.0) #366

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 3, 2022
Merged

Conversation

brunoocasali
Copy link
Member

@brunoocasali brunoocasali commented Sep 2, 2022

This version makes this package compatible with Meilisearch v0.29.0 🎉
Check out the changelog of Meilisearch v0.29.0 for more information on the changes.

🚀 Enhancements

⚠️ Breaking Changes

This breaking change may not affect you, but in any case, you should check your search queries if you want to keep the same behavior from v0.28.

@brunoocasali brunoocasali added the breaking-change The related changes are breaking for the users label Sep 2, 2022
@brunoocasali brunoocasali requested review from alallema, bidoubiwa and curquiza and removed request for bidoubiwa September 2, 2022 17:53
Copy link
Contributor

@bidoubiwa bidoubiwa left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 🔥

@brunoocasali
Copy link
Member Author

bors merge

@brunoocasali
Copy link
Member Author

bors cancel

meili-bors bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 20, 2022
366: Update version for the next release (v0.20.0) r=brunoocasali a=brunoocasali

This version makes this package compatible with Meilisearch v0.29.0 🎉
Check out the changelog of [Meilisearch v0.29.0](https://github.com/meilisearch/meilisearch/releases/tag/v0.29.0) for more information on the changes.

## 🚀 Enhancements

- Ensure support to the new search query parameter `matchingStrategy` (#364) `@brunoocasali` 
- Ensure support to keys with wildcarded actions.
  - `actions` field during key creation now accepts wildcards on actions. For example, `indexes.*` provides rights to `indexes.create`, `indexes.get`,`indexes.delete`, `indexes.delete`, and `indexes.update`. (#365) `@brunoocasali` 
  
## ⚠️ Breaking Changes

This breaking change *__may not affect you__*, but in any case, you should check your search queries if you want to keep the same behavior from `v0.28`.

- The `NOT` filter keyword does not have an implicitly `EXIST` operator anymore. Check out for more information: meilisearch/meilisearch#2486

Co-authored-by: Bruno Casali <brunoocasali@gmail.com>
@meili-bors
Copy link
Contributor

meili-bors bot commented Sep 20, 2022

Canceled.

Copy link
Member

@curquiza curquiza left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Are you sure the NOT breaking should be considered as a breaking in the Ruby integration? The warning is ok for me, and important for the users, but this change does impact technically the Ruby SDK version

Copy link
Member

@curquiza curquiza left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Discussed with @brunoocasali

I understood how it could be useful to increase the major instead of increasing the patch even if it's not the "official" definition of semver 😊

A guide describing your versioning policy could be even better 🔥

Base automatically changed from bump-meilisearch-v0.29.0 to main October 3, 2022 14:01
@curquiza
Copy link
Member

curquiza commented Oct 3, 2022

bors merge

@meili-bors
Copy link
Contributor

meili-bors bot commented Oct 3, 2022

@meili-bors meili-bors bot merged commit 05f7f01 into main Oct 3, 2022
@meili-bors meili-bors bot deleted the release-v0.20.0 branch October 3, 2022 14:03
@brunoocasali
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks again for contributing with Meilisearch ❤️
If you are participating in Hacktoberfest, and you would like to receive a small gift from Meilisearch too, don't forget to fill this form.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
breaking-change The related changes are breaking for the users
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants