Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Internal proxy example fix #1421

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Dec 18, 2024
Merged

Internal proxy example fix #1421

merged 6 commits into from
Dec 18, 2024

Conversation

t-burch
Copy link
Collaborator

@t-burch t-burch commented Dec 17, 2024

No description provided.

predic8 and others added 2 commits December 17, 2024 11:05
- Change configuration file reference in `service-proxy.sh` from `proxies_soap.xml` to `proxies.xml`.
- Update copyright year in `InternalProxyTest.java` from 2022 to 2024.
- Refactor test methods to enhance readability and consistency.
- Modify the test for express order processing to use RestAssured for HTTP requests.
- Add tests for regular order scenarios to ensure they fall through correctly.
@t-burch t-burch marked this pull request as draft December 17, 2024 12:31
@membrane-ci-server
Copy link

This pull request needs "/ok-to-test" from an authorized committer.

@rrayst
Copy link
Contributor

rrayst commented Dec 17, 2024

/ok-to-test

Clarify instructions for running the internal proxy example in the README file. Adjust the base URL in `InternalProxyTest` to match the correct port. Modify the assertions to reflect expected responses, ensuring they align with the newly defined processing routes for express and normal orders.
@t-burch t-burch requested a review from predic8 December 18, 2024 13:36
@t-burch t-burch marked this pull request as ready for review December 18, 2024 13:36
@t-burch
Copy link
Collaborator Author

t-burch commented Dec 18, 2024

/ok-to-test

@predic8 predic8 merged commit d3fbf28 into master Dec 18, 2024
3 of 4 checks passed
@predic8 predic8 deleted the internal-proxy-example-fix branch December 18, 2024 14:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants