Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: add ruff integration #34

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Feb 19, 2023
Merged

feat: add ruff integration #34

merged 7 commits into from
Feb 19, 2023

Conversation

XuehaiPan
Copy link
Member

Description

Describe your changes in detail.

Motivation and Context

Why is this change required? What problem does it solve?
If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here.
You can use the syntax close #15213 if this solves the issue #15213

  • I have raised an issue to propose this change (required for new features and bug fixes)

Add ruff integration and make it the first linter to run in pre-commit. Resolves #32 (comment).

Types of changes

What types of changes does your code introduce? Put an x in all the boxes that apply:

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds core functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Documentation (update in the documentation)

Checklist

Go over all the following points, and put an x in all the boxes that apply.
If you are unsure about any of these, don't hesitate to ask. We are here to help!

  • I have read the CONTRIBUTION guide. (required)
  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have updated the tests accordingly. (required for a bug fix or a new feature)
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • I have reformatted the code using make format. (required)
  • I have checked the code using make lint. (required)
  • I have ensured make test pass. (required)

@XuehaiPan XuehaiPan self-assigned this Feb 19, 2023
@XuehaiPan XuehaiPan added the enhancement New feature or request label Feb 19, 2023
@XuehaiPan XuehaiPan added this to the 0.8.0 milestone Feb 19, 2023
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 19, 2023

Codecov Report

Base: 100.00% // Head: 100.00% // No change to project coverage 👍

Coverage data is based on head (2ed86ca) compared to base (a112b5b).
Patch coverage: 100.00% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main       #34   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files            4         4           
  Lines          350       348    -2     
=========================================
- Hits           350       348    -2     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files Coverage Δ
optree/ops.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
optree/registry.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@XuehaiPan XuehaiPan force-pushed the ruff branch 3 times, most recently from 869e3df to 3b58d2a Compare February 19, 2023 09:11
Benjamin-eecs
Benjamin-eecs previously approved these changes Feb 19, 2023
Copy link
Member

@Benjamin-eecs Benjamin-eecs left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@XuehaiPan XuehaiPan merged commit 0a71edc into metaopt:main Feb 19, 2023
@XuehaiPan XuehaiPan deleted the ruff branch February 19, 2023 14:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Feature Request] Add flake8-comprehensions linter
2 participants