feat: allow tree-map with mixed inputs of ordered and unordered dictionaries

[XuehaiPan]

Description

Describe your changes in detail.

>>> from collections import *
>>> tree1 = {'a': 1, 'b': 2}
>>> tree2 = OrderedDict(b=2, a=1)
>>> tree3 = defaultdict(int, {'a': 1, 'b': 2})
>>> optree.tree_map(lambda x, y, z: x + y + z, tree1, tree2, tree3)
{'a': 3, 'b': 6}
>>> optree.tree_map(lambda x, y, z: x + y + z, tree2, tree1, tree3)
OrderedDict([('b', 6), ('a', 3)])
>>> optree.tree_map(lambda x, y, z: x + y + z, tree3, tree1, tree2)
defaultdict(<class 'int'>, {'a': 3, 'b': 6})
>>> optree.tree_map(lambda x, y: x + y, {'a': 1, 'b': 2}, defaultdict(int, {'a': 1}))
ValueError: dictionary key mismatch; expected key(s): ['a', 'b'], got key(s): ['a'], missing key(s): ['b']; dict: defaultdict(<class 'int'>, {'a': 1}).

Motivation and Context

Why is this change required? What problem does it solve?
If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here.
You can use the syntax close #15213 if this solves the issue #15213

• I have raised an issue to propose this change (required for new features and bug fixes)

Resolves #27

Types of changes

What types of changes does your code introduce? Put an x in all the boxes that apply:

• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds core functionality)
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
• Documentation (update in the documentation)

Checklist

Go over all the following points, and put an x in all the boxes that apply.
If you are unsure about any of these, don't hesitate to ask. We are here to help!

• I have read the CONTRIBUTION guide. (required)
• My change requires a change to the documentation.
• I have updated the tests accordingly. (required for a bug fix or a new feature)
• I have updated the documentation accordingly.
• I have reformatted the code using make format. (required)
• I have checked the code using make lint. (required)
• I have ensured make test pass. (required)

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 100.00% and no project coverage change.

Comparison is base (f608bfb) 100.00% compared to head (9ce80da) 100.00%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main       #42   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files            4         4           
  Lines          384       420   +36     
=========================================
+ Hits           384       420   +36     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
optree/ops.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
optree/registry.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
optree/utils.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.