Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Split out processing directives, comments, and other special "elements" #250

Closed
michaelrsweet opened this issue Mar 2, 2019 · 2 comments
Closed

Split out processing directives, comments, and other special "elements" #250

michaelrsweet opened this issue Mar 2, 2019 · 2 comments
Assignees
@michaelrsweet
Labels
enhancement New feature or request priority-medium
Milestone
v4.0

Comments

@michaelrsweet
Copy link
Owner

michaelrsweet commented Mar 2, 2019 •
edited
Loading

Currently we lump all <something> constructs into the MXML_ELEMENT node type. Break those out to make it easier to support them.
@michaelrsweet michaelrsweet added the enhancement New feature or request label Mar 2, 2019
@michaelrsweet michaelrsweet added this to the v4.0 milestone Mar 2, 2019
@michaelrsweet michaelrsweet self-assigned this Mar 2, 2019
@michaelrsweet
Copy link
Owner Author

michaelrsweet commented Feb 28, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Specifically want to add:

MXML_TYPE_COMMENT,   // Comment ("<!--something-->")
MXML_TYPE_CDATA,     // CDATA section ("<![CDATA[something]]>")
MXML_TYPE_DIRECTIVE, // Processing instruction ("<?something?>")

No support for other XML-like DTD representations such as "" or "", since those cannot exist in an XML document.

@michaelrsweet
Copy link
Owner Author

[master 0cd995c] Add separate node types for comments, CDATA, directives, and declarations (Issue #250)

michaelrsweet added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 3, 2024
@michaelrsweet
Add separate node types for comments, CDATA, directives, and declarat…
0cd995c 
…ions (Issue #250)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@michaelrsweet michaelrsweet

Labels
enhancement New feature or request priority-medium
Projects
None yet
Milestone
v4.0
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@michaelrsweet