-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 143
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add extra dns zones and links #2828
Conversation
@microsoft-github-policy-service agree [company="UCL"] |
@microsoft-github-policy-service agree company="UCL" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
DNS zones are taking more time in the deployment, so I just want to know if other options have been considered... Depending how the azure services are planned to be deployed it might be possible to use shared services for this?
good question – not sure. will need @marrobi 's input |
Each one could be done as a separate shared service, or could do something similar to what I've done with External URI, single shared service, can be deployed multiple time with different DNS zone name. or even an array? PR is open, and @tanya-borisova is looking at how to handle singleton services as part of #2820 . The other option is we have an environment variable with a list of all the DNS zones passed into the core deployment. @tamirkamara thoughts? A single DNS zones shared service with array is maybe a nice solution for these "optional" DNS zones. |
Also worth noting @t-young31 has followed the approach used for AML, so maybe merge this and then take the "improved" approach, as a new issue? |
One more thing, if it was a single shared service with an array, a pipeline in the workspace could add the DNs zones as per the same method used for firewall rules. |
Yes, something like this. Another approach to the lack of state for the core system, is to add a shared service exactly for that, something like common state (store) and have the pipeline procedure interact with it. It seems a bit "hacky" but will work... |
/test 1214b09 |
🤖 pr-bot 🤖 🏃 Running tests: https://github.com/microsoft/AzureTRE/actions/runs/3417386577 (with refid (in response to this comment from @tamirkamara) |
/test-extended 1214b09 |
🤖 pr-bot 🤖 🏃 Running extended tests: https://github.com/microsoft/AzureTRE/actions/runs/3418057109 (with refid (in response to this comment from @tamirkamara) |
Resolves #2827
How is this addressed