-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[R-package] prefer params to keyword argument in lgb.train() #5007
Merged
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
e7ab89b
[R-package] prefer params to keyword argument in lgb.train()
jameslamb 148147d
Merge branch 'master' into fix/prefer-objective-param
jameslamb 297a0a5
make test stricter
jameslamb 0ee178a
Apply suggestions from code review
jameslamb 6fec1b6
Merge branch 'master' into fix/prefer-objective-param
jameslamb File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe you remember why is this line needed? Or more generally: why is
lgb.check.obj()
function needed?Looks like there is a duplication with a similar check at cpp side. For example, there is no similar logic in the Python-package, but users can pass only registered objective names. Please consider the following example:
and the output:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks to me like
lgb.check.obj()
has been a part of the R package since the very first PR introducing the R package, back in 2017.https://github.com/microsoft/LightGBM/blame/9259a5318cd03951f2eefe378d9fb8db74457ee3/R-package/R/utils.R#L120
#168
I agree that in the current version of the R package, this isn't really necessary any more. And I'd support removing it, to remove the need to maintain a hard-coded list of objective names in the R package.
Raises the following exception:
I'll open a separate PR tonight factoring it out.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Great, thanks!