P0849R8 auto(x): decay-copy In The Language
#2808
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Is the compiler part implemented? |
|
@AlexGuteniev no, compiler gives error C3537, at least in 17.3 Preview 2 |
CaseyCarter
reviewed
Jun 22, 2022
CaseyCarter
approved these changes
Jun 22, 2022
miscco
approved these changes
Jun 23, 2022
|
I'm mirroring this to the MSVC-internal repo - please notify me if any further changes are pushed. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #2243. Thanks to @frederick-vs-ja and @CaseyCarter for analyzing the issue (see their comments there).
We implemented this in C++20 mode:
STL/stl/inc/xutility
Line 1698 in 7f04137
STL/stl/inc/xutility
Line 1829 in 7f04137
STL/stl/inc/xutility
Line 2003 in 7f04137
STL/stl/inc/xutility
Line 2072 in 7f04137
While this is theoretically observable, it would require some effort to test, and the risk of damaging this is extremely low, so I have chosen the lazy kitty path of "comment the feature as done, then flop over". 🐈