forked from denisenkom/go-mssqldb
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 67
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Allow for local dns resolution with a custom dialer #121
Merged
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
might there be value in defining an interface to determine if the custom dialer handles DNS lookups? Do we know that all of them do?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
My initial thought is that if the custom dialer sends the final request to a different network, that they would want to use the DNS lookup where the actual requests will later be sent to.
For example, if the driver is being run in a k8s namespace that has a MSSQL instance with the local DNS of
mssql
, but we want to proxy the request to a separate MSSQL instance in another cluster with the local DNS ofmssql2
, we'd want the DNS resolution to happen on the other k8s cluster, otherwise we may get false positives that the DNS is correct if we are usingmssql
, when it won't work (Or vice versa if the DNS is switched):But if there is a use case for it, I'd be happy to implement this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think we're in disagreement about the end result. I'm asking if there are multiple types of custom dialers - some that proxy to other networks and some that rely on the current DNS lookup and if we'd need to distinguish between the two. EG, your dialer is clearly of the former. Anyone using the existing model, though, is getting the DNS lookup "for free" and we risk breaking them.
Maybe a better name for
Dialer
would have beenIPDialer
since the driver has always called it with an IP address up to now.Your dialer could be
HostDialer
which takes a host name.eg
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sounds good! I'll work on implementing the second
HostDialer
interfaceThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Added :)