Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 16, 2023. It is now read-only.

Update master branch after v0.1a.x release #9

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 14, 2019
Merged

Update master branch after v0.1a.x release #9

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions azure_monitor/setup.cfg
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -9,11 +9,11 @@ author = Microsoft
author_email = appinsightssdk@microsoft.com
url = https://github.com/microsoft/opentelemetry-exporters-python
platforms = any
license = Apache-2.0
license = MIT
classifiers =
Development Status :: 3 - Alpha
Intended Audience :: Developers
License :: OSI Approved :: Apache Software License
License :: OSI Approved :: MIT License
Programming Language :: Python
Programming Language :: Python :: 3
Programming Language :: Python :: 3.4
Expand Down
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion azure_monitor/src/azure_monitor/version.py
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
# Copyright (c) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
# Licensed under the MIT License.
__version__ = "0.1.dev0"
__version__ = "0.2.dev0"
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is the goal to keep this in sync with opentelemetry-python? If so it should be 0.3.dev0 (and if not you might not want the "alpha" designation in your releases).

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think we have the intention in keep this in sync with opentelemetry-python.
Curious, why do we not want to have the "alpha" designation? I don't believe the package is ready for beta or GA yet. Isn't alpha an appropriate categorization?