Fix 264234: Allow passing in sanitizing options when create Content Model from HTML #2543
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
JiuqingSong
requested review from
flyingbee2012,
BryanValverdeU,
ianeli1,
vinguyen12,
juliaroldi and
Andres-CT98
juliaroldi
approved these changes
Mar 28, 2024
vinguyen12
approved these changes
Mar 28, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We now allow passing in DomToModel options for
createModelFromHtml, but if there is general or entity model inside, it is always using the default sanitizing options to sanitize HTML. This can cause some attribute to be lost.To fix it, change the parameter type from
DomToModelOptiontoDomToModelOptionForSanitizingso we can pass in sanitizing options in, and use this option to build sanitizing processor for general and entity model.