Provide our own implementation of scrollCaretIntoView
#2685
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
JiuqingSong
requested review from
flyingbee2012,
BryanValverdeU,
ianeli1,
vinguyen12,
juliaroldi and
Andres-CT98
BryanValverdeU
approved these changes
Jun 6, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Previously I added a feature in
formatContentModelto allow scroll caret into view after write back with Content Model. It was using browser'sscrollIntoViewimplementation which has some problem especially when caret is already visible. And we also need to handle the case when visible viewport is not the actual size of editor (getVisibleViewport()will give us the expected value). So in this change I created our own implementation ofscrollCreateIntoView, and call it from existing format API