Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[luasocket] bump to 3.1.0 #31078

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 2, 2023

Conversation

TheCycoONE
Copy link
Contributor

@TheCycoONE TheCycoONE commented Apr 24, 2023

  • Changes comply with the maintainer guide
  • SHA512s are updated for each updated download
  • The "supports" clause reflects platforms that may be fixed by this new version
  • Any fixed CI baseline entries are removed from that file.
  • Any patches that are no longer applied are deleted from the port's directory.
  • The version database is fixed by rerunning ./vcpkg x-add-version --all and committing the result.
  • Only one version is added to each modified port's versions file.

@JonLiu1993 JonLiu1993 added the category:port-update The issue is with a library, which is requesting update new revision label Apr 24, 2023
@TheCycoONE
Copy link
Contributor Author

Updated with the suggestions from @JonLiu1993
Thanks.

@TheCycoONE
Copy link
Contributor Author

@JonLiu1993 @Cheney-W is anything else expected of me?

endif()
file(RENAME "${CURRENT_PACKAGES_DIR}/bin/socket/socket.core.dll" "${CURRENT_PACKAGES_DIR}/bin/socket/core.dll" RESULT temp)
file(RENAME "${CURRENT_PACKAGES_DIR}/bin/socket/socket.core.pdb" "${CURRENT_PACKAGES_DIR}/bin/socket/core.pdb" RESULT temp)
file(RENAME "${CURRENT_PACKAGES_DIR}/debug/bin/socket/socket.core.dll" "${CURRENT_PACKAGES_DIR}/debug/bin/socket/core.dll" RESULT temp)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I see you are storing the results of the rename in temp, but I don't see temp being used for anything. Is this intentional or am I missing something?

@TheCycoONE
Copy link
Contributor Author

TheCycoONE commented May 2, 2023 via email

@TheCycoONE
Copy link
Contributor Author

TheCycoONE commented May 2, 2023 via email

@JavierMatosD JavierMatosD merged commit 6d69bba into microsoft:master May 2, 2023
@dg0yt
Copy link
Contributor

dg0yt commented May 3, 2023

It's intentional to avoid failing when the files don't exist. There use to be conditionals on them and even they didn't cover community triplets.

A variable name like unused would have made this clear.
And I think at least for the DLLs it would have been good to have proper conditionals.

@JonLiu1993 JonLiu1993 added info:reviewed Pull Request changes follow basic guidelines and removed requires:author-response labels May 4, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
category:port-update The issue is with a library, which is requesting update new revision info:reviewed Pull Request changes follow basic guidelines
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants