Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Chips: Don't explicitly close autocomplete on inputBlur - fixes #587 #632

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 26, 2017

Conversation

pauln
Copy link
Contributor

@pauln pauln commented Jan 30, 2017

Explicitly closing the autocomplete component on inputBlur broke the ability to add custom items to the chips element (assuming requireMatch is not true). It doesn't appear to be necessary for any other purpose.

@v3ss0n
Copy link

v3ss0n commented Apr 26, 2017

ping @miguelcobain , that is only one of few bug we have found on ember-paper so far . in production.
Would be nice if you have time to merge this.

…ed-ember-addons#587

Explicitly closing the autocomplete component on inputBlur broke the ability to add custom items to the chips element (assuming requireMatch is not true).  It doesn't appear to be necessary for any other purpose.
@pauln
Copy link
Contributor Author

pauln commented Jul 19, 2017

Rebased - merging #615 caused a minor conflict.

@pauln
Copy link
Contributor Author

pauln commented Jul 19, 2017

The Travis failures are on ember-beta and ember-canary, and are unrelated to this change (see #747 for another PR which exhibits those same failures).

@pauln pauln mentioned this pull request Jul 26, 2017
@miguelcobain miguelcobain marked this as a duplicate of #758 Jul 26, 2017
@miguelcobain miguelcobain merged commit 705a034 into adopted-ember-addons:master Jul 26, 2017
@miguelcobain
Copy link
Collaborator

Sorry for taking ridiculously long to merge this quick awesome fix.

@pauln pauln deleted the fix-587 branch July 26, 2017 01:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants