You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Based on a quick read, it seems to me that Grin rewards the miner by simply adding the fees.
In the literature [0] it has been suggested that this is suboptimal from an incentive point of view, as it results in more complex bidding strategies and a bad user experience.
I suspect it's non-trivial to adapt the suggested changes for Bitcoin to Grin, but haven't so far seen it mentioned anywhere, so thought I'd put it on the radar.
Grin's fee structure is actually actively being revised at the moment, see details in this RFC that is in Final Comment Period: mimblewimble/grin-rfcs#63
If you have concrete suggestions on how the current RFC proposal could be improved, please raise them in the RFC pull requestASAP as it is about to be finalised soon and development will commence to target v5.0.0.
In the meanwhile, I'm closing this ticket as a duplicate.
Based on a quick read, it seems to me that Grin rewards the miner by simply adding the fees.
In the literature [0] it has been suggested that this is suboptimal from an incentive point of view, as it results in more complex bidding strategies and a bad user experience.
I suspect it's non-trivial to adapt the suggested changes for Bitcoin to Grin, but haven't so far seen it mentioned anywhere, so thought I'd put it on the radar.
[0] https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3318327
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: