-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Sound Levels and Silence detector #13412
Comments
Please define "efficient" and "great". Please provide an example / comparison with a pecific track analyzed with 2.3.0 and a version which you consider worse. FWIW the silence threshold of -60 dB has not been changed for ages. |
Here you're referring to AutoDJ IIUC. |
Not sure what you are referring to here either. The main output level? The track volume? |
In audio processing you usually use a compressor / expander effect for this. |
Hi Yeah, I know all about the gain and everything, but it's annoying that a song may start with a quiet piece and then get louder. I have noticed a few modern songs tend to get loud up to the end. Having said that, the sound level in version 2.3.0 are the better ones. The level doesn't go loud and stay relatively level with each other except the quiet bits are still relatively quiet. So to some up. With Sound level, Crossfader auto return, I feel version 2.3.0 is the better one so far. Hope this helps. |
I forgot to include what I mean by Efficient... The Silence Detector I have issues where I can set it for the end of straight ending song as I mentioned above, but then the silence is not detected on Fade out songs. So I have set it somewhere in the middle. (I have tried Intro/outro settings, Skip silence settings. Still crashes certain tracks in places or too much silence no matter how I set it) |
As mentioned earlier, please provide comparable examples.
Then please share the db files here so we can compare the first/last sound cue points and the detected ReplayGain. |
Hi There, Please be a bit clearer. I will pick this up in the morning (Friday). Thank you. Goodnight Sir. |
Exactly. You mentioned you tried various versions and went back to 2.3.0 because that's where you say you experienced the best silence detector and levels.
Yes. Ideally all other versions you tested and considered "not good".
No, I didn't write that.
Thank you. |
Good Morning. Ok I will work on that throughout the morning today. |
Hi Again. Also, Could I put the mixxxdb_2.3.0.sqlite into version 2.4.1? I'll try to attched the files, but it comes up as text. |
I have my answer about using the db from 230 in 241... You can't. Again I hope I was able to help this morning. |
Logs are useless, they don't contain analysis data or cue positions. Also, you dropped many tracks into Mixxx (a playlist?) while I asked to drop exactly one track (the same track for all Mixxx versions you are going to test). I reworde the test steps, I hope there it's all clear now. Please follow these steps exactly. Thanks for your time. |
OK, Sorry, You will have to give me some time now as I can't do it all right now, but I will try it later. At least I now know how to upload the files. So I should only run ONE Track, the same one in every test?? Have I got that right? |
Take your time.
Yes, the same track file for all test. (it's all about comparing analysis results, right)
Yes : )
Turns out Github does not allow to attach sqlite files to comments, you'll have to zip them and share the zip (just attach here, no external file hosting please). |
Oh, That bit I'm not sure what to do about the "Zipping" thing. I might be getting in over my head here. I will see. Got some things I have to do first (Life stuff) then when I get to settle I will see what I can do. |
Don't worry. |
I've done some research and I think I now know how to zip a file. Gotta Get On Do it later. |
mixxxdb.zip (2.3.0) mixxxdb.zip (2.3.1) mixxxdb.zip (2.3.2) mixxxdb.zip (2.4.0) mixxxdb.zip 2.4.1 Hi Again. I also Hope that I have helped in some way. |
The gain levels are identical in all versions.. |
Good Morning Sir, At this stage I have found the most comfortable version for me. Perhaps in the future I will find an updated version comfortable too. Thank you for keeping me updated on your findings and sorry to be such a pain about nearly nothing. Please don't spend too much time on such a small issue. Have a good day. |
Yes. The detected duration of that Abba song is 232.698.. seconds in 2.3.x, versus 232.672.. in 2.4.x
I could wery well have been that there is a regression/bug and no one noticed except you. |
As I said, after analysis, the automatically set intro start is identical with the first detected sound (level raises above -60 dB), outro end is the last sound (level falls below -60 dB), so intro_S and outro_E are the cues that are used for the "Skip Silence" mode. See https://manual.mixxx.org/2.4/en/chapters/djing_with_mixxx#full-track-and-skip-silence
If you find that "Skip Silence" + fixed transition time doesn't work for all tracks for you, then you simply need to set intro END and outro START for all tracks that you plan to use with AutoDJ. You can even shift the intro start and outro end in case you want to play less/more of the tracks. |
Yeah. I do actually understand what you are saying. I have set the transitions that works quite well now, with the odd one here and there that crash a little. I will have to check all my settings to see if I can replicate it in following versions. I'm happy with the sound levels right now with 2.3.0 although I still don't understand though why I can't get 2.3.1 to have similar sound levels to 2.3.0 . Having said that, both 2.3.0 and 2.3.1 are virtually identical anyway. |
Expired for Mixxx because there has been no activity for 60 days. |
Bug Description
I have been advised to mention this. The silence detector after version 2.3.0 is not efficient. Never been great anyway. And sound levels are ok but not Great. Maybe someone could make Mixxx detect if a song has a quiet section as well as a loud section and keep them at a constant level. No software/app actually does that as yet. If Mixxx could do that, then it will rise above all the others. AS for silence, well you still have to tell Mixxx where the song ends. It can't determine if it's a straight end or Fade end. Often cuts off the end of a straight ending song, or brings in the next track too late after a fade off song. It really needs to know the difference somehow. eg. if you have the transition set to 4 seconds it will start the next track at 4 seconds regardless if the previous song is still playing. If you set it too late as in 2 seconds, then it will start the next track too late on a fade off. Therefore I'm not sure if the "Silence detector" actually works. I know this is not an easy task. I just thought I'd give it a mention.
I'm currently running version 2.3.0 as I have tried the later one's but none at present (Except Version 2.3.2) has the "Crossfader auto return" also the sound levels and crossfader transitions are better with that version. Mixxx seems to have lost it's way with later releases.
Version
2.3.0 (See above for reason why)
OS
Windows 11
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: