You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We have a huge variety of inconsistency in the preference pages. There are 4 main events the preference pages get and currently every page treats them differently.
Update (load the latest config settings into the GUI widgets)
Apply (take the GUI widget settings and write them to the user config, live COs)
Cancel (take changes since last Update and revert them)
Reset to defaults (reset the GUI widgets to default values, then call Apply to write them to the config)
Show (the preferences dialog is shown to the user)
Hide (the preferences dialog is hidden from the user)
When the user opens preferences, a Show and Update event is delivered to every page.
When the user hits Apply, an Apply event is delivered to the current page.
When the user hits OK, an Apply and Hide event is delivered to every page.
When the user hits Reset, a Reset event is delivered to the current page.
The GUI widgets themselves are also quite inconsistent on whether they trigger updates if a user changes the widget or if code changes the widget. Code changing the widget triggering slots can lead to circularity and so all widgets should only trigger slots if a user changes them, not if code does.
All the pages do different things on update and apply. Some of them update widgets and config/COs on update, some of them update widgets only but because widgets trigger on code changes, that also updates the config and live COs. It's a big mess.
We also need to track dirty state uniformly across all pages. That way we can enable or disable the apply button if the page is clean.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Reported by: rryan
Date: 2014-04-17T16:04:49Z
Status: In Progress
Importance: Low
Launchpad Issue: lp1309089
Tags: polish, preferences, usability
We have a huge variety of inconsistency in the preference pages. There are 4 main events the preference pages get and currently every page treats them differently.
The GUI widgets themselves are also quite inconsistent on whether they trigger updates if a user changes the widget or if code changes the widget. Code changing the widget triggering slots can lead to circularity and so all widgets should only trigger slots if a user changes them, not if code does.
All the pages do different things on update and apply. Some of them update widgets and config/COs on update, some of them update widgets only but because widgets trigger on code changes, that also updates the config and live COs. It's a big mess.
We also need to track dirty state uniformly across all pages. That way we can enable or disable the apply button if the page is clean.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: