Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

hack around Xlib deadlock #1923

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Dec 5, 2018
Merged

hack around Xlib deadlock #1923

merged 6 commits into from
Dec 5, 2018

Conversation

Be-ing
Copy link
Contributor

@Be-ing Be-ing commented Nov 28, 2018

@Be-ing
Copy link
Contributor Author

Be-ing commented Nov 28, 2018

Oops this breaks running with -platform wayland...

Otherwise calling Xlib functions segfaults when running as a
Wayland client
@uklotzde
Copy link
Contributor

I've cherry-pricked the commits for testing. But since I didn't experience the issue I can only test for any unwanted side effects.

Running Mixxx with QtWayland never really worked, even without this patch. The UI is incomplete and Mixxx is unresponsive, so I won't test this use case.

@Be-ing
Copy link
Contributor Author

Be-ing commented Nov 28, 2018

Yes the QPA Wayland backend has many issues that make it not ready for production. Just at first glance, high DPI scaling is somehow handled differently (a scale factor of 1.5 looks the same as 3.0 with X??) and my theme does not apply. I just wanted to make sure this didn't break running with the QPA Wayland backend any more than Qt is broken with it. I would not be surprised if it becomes the default in the future.

src/mixxx.cpp Outdated
@@ -81,10 +81,41 @@
#include "preferences/dialog/dlgprefmodplug.h"
#endif

#ifdef Q_OS_LINUX
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please replace all occurrences of #ifdef Q_OS_LINUX in this patch with #if defined(Q_WS_X11) that we already used for this purpose in other parts of Mixxx.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I can't find any documentation for Q_WS_X11 for Qt5. Conceptually it doesn't make sense. The window system is not determined at compile, but at runtime. I think Q_OS_LINUX is correct.

Copy link
Contributor

@uklotzde uklotzde Nov 29, 2018

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What happens if you neither have X11 nor its development headers installed? This might not happen soon, but it will happen. We use Qt as an abstraction layer and usually it doesn't matter. But here the abstraction leaks through at compile time.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we can defer that until it becomes a real problem. If Qt doesn't help us when that comes, we'll have to detect the presence of X headers in our build system.

typedef Bool (*WireToErrorType)(Display*, XErrorEvent*, xError*);

const int NUM_HANDLERS = 256;
WireToErrorType __oldHandlers[NUM_HANDLERS] = {0};
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I still don't get the magic behind this array. Which unknown side effect sets the elements to a value other than 0? Currently the error interceptor does nothing except ignoring and dropping all incoming extension errors. This can be implemented in a much simpler way.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Honestly, neither do I, nor do I understand the magic number 256. I've never worked with X11 code before, much less understand X's internals. I just copied and pasted from https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59361#c4 and got it to build.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

256 because the error code is an unsigned char with values ranging from 0 to 255. But all slots are initialized with 0 (= nullptr) and are never updated.

src/mixxx.cpp Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@Be-ing Be-ing force-pushed the xlib_deadlock branch 3 times, most recently from 83e5780 to 02af45b Compare November 29, 2018 22:02
@uklotzde
Copy link
Contributor

uklotzde commented Dec 1, 2018

Missing dependency in .travis.yml!

@uklotzde
Copy link
Contributor

uklotzde commented Dec 1, 2018

After installing qt5-qtx11extras-devel I get this build error:

[CXX] src/mixxx.cpp
src/mixxx.cpp:84:10: fatal error: QtGui/QX11Info: No such file or directory
 #include <QtGui/QX11Info>
          ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
compilation terminated.

This include works:

#include <QtX11Extras/QX11Info>

@uklotzde
Copy link
Contributor

uklotzde commented Dec 1, 2018

Next failure during linking:

/usr/bin/ld: lin64_build/mixxx.o: in function `MixxxMainWindow::MixxxMainWindow(QApplication*, CmdlineArgs const&)':
/home/uk/Projects/Mixxx/mixxx/src/mixxx.cpp:187: undefined reference to `qt_x11_wait_for_window_manager(QWidget*)'
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status

@Be-ing
Copy link
Contributor Author

Be-ing commented Dec 3, 2018

Well this is interesting. That link error is because I switched from Q_WS_X11 to Q_OS_LINUX. I tested switching that ifdef back to Q_WS_X11 and adding a qWarning, and the qWarning was not printed, so it seems Q_WS_X11 is not defined with Qt 5. The call to qt_x11_wait_for_window_manager was added by @daschuer when implementing the splash screen for the 2.0 release. Considering that it hasn't actually been used since switching to Qt 5 and this doesn't seem to be causing any regressions, I presume it's safe to remove.

This was previously guarded by an #ifdef Q_WS_X11, but switching
to Q_OS_LINUX caused a link error:

/usr/bin/ld: lin64_build/mixxx.o: in function `MixxxMainWindow::MixxxMainWindow(QApplication*, CmdlineArgs const&)':
/home/uk/Projects/Mixxx/mixxx/src/mixxx.cpp:187: undefined reference to `qt_x11_wait_for_window_manager(QWidget*)'

It turns out that Q_WS_X11 is no longer defined with Qt5, yet it
does not seem that building Mixxx without the call to
qt_x11_wait_for_window_manager has caused any issues, so I presume
it is safe to remove it now. This was the only place in Mixxx
where Q_WS_X11 was referenced.
@uklotzde
Copy link
Contributor

uklotzde commented Dec 3, 2018

libqt5x11extras5-dev is still missing in .travis.yml to fix the CI build

@uklotzde
Copy link
Contributor

uklotzde commented Dec 4, 2018

Using the unmodified patch is feasible since we have no clue how the code actually is intended to work. As far as I understand it suppresses errors to avoid getting stuck at a subsequent lock.

If this workaround is effective (what I'm not able to validate) I have no objections merging it. LGTM.

@Be-ing Be-ing merged commit d37d407 into mixxxdj:2.2 Dec 5, 2018
@Be-ing
Copy link
Contributor Author

Be-ing commented Dec 5, 2018

I experienced no crash after playing for 1.5 hours. Of course that doesn't necessarily mean the problem is solved, but I'll keep testing.

@Be-ing Be-ing deleted the xlib_deadlock branch April 25, 2019 01:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants