-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[on hold] WIP: Support decorators stage 2 proposal, implements #1352 #1732
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
23 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
d5d9195
Switched to stage 2 decorator implementation
mweststrate 3d3ee18
First implementation of stage 2 decorators
mweststrate bc572f0
Fixed unchecked exception in reaction test suite
mweststrate f9b7f0d
Keep class properties `loose` to support `decorate`
mweststrate c7990cf
Minor fixes, skipped some tests
mweststrate ef0f674
Clean up action decorator
mweststrate f44fc89
Restored tests
mweststrate 006c312
Minor improvements
mweststrate 152805e
Lowered prettier version to fix formatting
mweststrate afdb00f
Cleaner code path separation for stage2 computed
mweststrate b4b427c
cleaned up @observable implementation
mweststrate 4503c6e
code cleanup
mweststrate a5818ba
Some tidy up
mweststrate 3cbcfb5
Found work around for late initialization
mweststrate 1c7093a
Introduced better work-around for lazy observable initialization
mweststrate 1bcb4a9
Disabled perf test
mweststrate ac3d2ef
Added TODO about using stage2 impl for decorate / extendobservable in…
mweststrate 6092288
Updated Changelog
mweststrate 2ef7347
fixed typo
mweststrate 88c8c3a
Merge branch 'master' into decorators-stage-2
mweststrate 23d245e
Upgraded to Babel 7.3.0
mweststrate 93a81e3
WIP: use hooks from the proposal
mweststrate 9d88fdf
Added codefirst to the sponsors list
mweststrate File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe instead of recommending
decoratorsBeforeExport: true
you could just say that it is similar to the old behavior but that it could change? Since TC39 hasn't decided yet it would be better not to recommend neithertrue
notfalse
.