Fix #265 -- drop hard dependency on contenttypes framework
#476
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
amureki
changed the title
contenttypes framework
amureki
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 9, 2024
* origin/main: Bump 1.19.0 Fix #483 -- Add Django 5.1 support (#485) Bump 1.18.3 Refs #416 -- Allow combination of GFK and `_fill_optional` (#438) Bump 1.18.2 Update ruff CI syntax (#481) Fix #28 -- allow make_recipe to work with _quantity (#480) Bump 1.18.1 Replace expensive `count()` with cheap `exists()` (#478) Update CI Python version to 3.12 Delete hard action requirement for a changelog Bump 1.18.0 Fix #265 -- drop hard dependency on `contenttypes` framework (#476) Bump GitHub Actions artifacts to v4 (#470) Drop Django 3.2 support (#475) Bump actions/setup-python from 4 to 5 (#466) Drop Django 4.1 support (reached end of life) (#465) Support Django 5.0 (#464)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Describe the change
As mentioned in #265 - we are not hard-depending on
contenttypesframework, so we need to be able to bake without it.It is a bit tricky as there are multiple places, where we are using
contenttypesframework andauthframework (which depends oncontenttypes), however nothing is impossible.PR Checklist